tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post113207149890151945..comments2023-10-28T03:14:44.519-07:00Comments on Calhouns Can(n)ons: NewsstandGreghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04099049885765768069noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-1132240974476688182005-11-17T07:22:00.000-08:002005-11-17T07:22:00.000-08:00Which is why this "breach of contract" issue needs...Which is why this "breach of contract" issue needs to be settled by a judge before anyone does anything. Otherwise, it's lawsuit city for the next fifty years.Churadogshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05362538114791652208noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-1132209628646768492005-11-16T22:40:00.000-08:002005-11-16T22:40:00.000-08:00Just 10 minutes into reading this pile something i...Just 10 minutes into reading this pile something interesting jumped out.<BR/><BR/>See page 5 of the PDF. The LOCSD is still misreading the SRF contract between the SWRCB and the LOCSD. The LOCSD is still claiming they have the right to temporarily suspend work. The original contract (which the CSD is misrepresenting here ... how they think they can misquote the state and have the state not catch on is beyond belief) gives <B>the SWRCB</B> the right to suspend work, not the CSD.<BR/><BR/>How can the "contract guy" get this one wrong.<BR/><BR/>What are Dan and Lisa thinking?<BR/><BR/>I get the distinct feeling that they are simply grasping at straws, trying to deal with the massive ****up of the board's initial action.Shark Inlethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07308339749797881391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-1132208769520142462005-11-16T22:26:00.000-08:002005-11-16T22:26:00.000-08:00Okay, while the CSD can't get the document up on t...Okay, while the CSD can't get the document up on their webiste properly, I found<BR/><A HREF="http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralcoast/documents/LosOsosCSDResponsetoACLComplaint.pdf" REL="nofollow">http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralcoast/documents/LosOsosCSDResponsetoACLComplaint.pdf</A> at the CCRWQCB document portion of the SWRCB website.<BR/><BR/>Enjoy...Shark Inlethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07308339749797881391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-1132169127427754792005-11-16T11:25:00.000-08:002005-11-16T11:25:00.000-08:00Here is what is funny ... the LOCSD just put up a ...Here is what is funny ... the LOCSD just put up a link to the ACL compalint response but the link is dead. <BR/><BR/>Ann, you seem to be down there every so often or at least in the good graces of the people in the office, could you please let them know they should fix the link?Shark Inlethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07308339749797881391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-1132155117161251382005-11-16T07:31:00.000-08:002005-11-16T07:31:00.000-08:00Dear Anonymous, Rich is right. I suspect that lit...Dear Anonymous, Rich is right. I suspect that little document is just the tip of the iceberg. Not sure when it'll be posted at the CSD. site. I hope everyone will read it and also, they need to read the July 2004 (I think) RWQCB's staff report on various "remdedies & penalties" Not sure if Ron at Sewerwatch has cached that one. THAT one makes really, reeeeely interesting reading.Churadogshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05362538114791652208noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-1132090547083488572005-11-15T13:35:00.000-08:002005-11-15T13:35:00.000-08:00Ann - thanks for the tip. Just read through it. ...Ann - thanks for the tip. Just read through it. Do you think the RWQCB might back off? This is rich!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com