tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post1184891327006106145..comments2023-10-28T03:14:44.519-07:00Comments on Calhouns Can(n)ons: NewsstandGreghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04099049885765768069noreply@blogger.comBlogger78125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-82350053332859476822007-11-02T14:21:00.000-07:002007-11-02T14:21:00.000-07:00Richard,I'd like you to address the issue as soon ...Richard,<BR/><BR/>I'd like you to address the issue as soon as possible.<BR/><BR/>You're not being vilified without reason and you're not the victim. You're the suspect.<BR/><BR/>Sewer MagicSewer Magichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02460653964012592425noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-33292936245916287272007-11-02T14:08:00.000-07:002007-11-02T14:08:00.000-07:00Hi Sewer Magic,My 'move'? This is a game?Anyway, w...Hi Sewer Magic,<BR/><BR/>My 'move'? This is a game?<BR/><BR/>Anyway, why bother. <BR/>As you are pontificating as judge, jury and executioner to expressly vilify me, it is very clear that any dicussion with you futile. Your welcome to believe anything you wish.<BR/><BR/>So much for my thinking that you would want to discuss community issues.<BR/><BR/>Regards, Richard LeGrosRichard LeGroshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15209499066835732066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-27759876359193574962007-11-02T12:58:00.000-07:002007-11-02T12:58:00.000-07:00To sharkinlet:Define "here." Richard,Private citiz...To sharkinlet:<BR/><BR/>Define "here." <BR/><BR/>Richard,<BR/><BR/>Private citizens are no longer private citizens when they publicly discriminate against the constituents that he used to represent and I think your words and actions fully represent the sentiments of Taxpayers Watch. Since Taxpayers Watch supposedly represents community interests, that completely legitimizes this discussion as a community issue.<BR/><BR/>This is no longer about perception of behavior, Richard. This is dealing with circumstances that you've established: your reputation, your previous comments on Calhoun's blog and posts on the SanLuisObispo.com discussion board. A reasonable person can find your actions to be vindictive. A reasonable person can find Taxpayers Watch's roasting of those people to be vindictive and not once have you ever apologized on behalf of your base.<BR/><BR/>Your move.<BR/><BR/>Sewer MagicSewer Magichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02460653964012592425noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-6442858577051704442007-11-02T10:22:00.000-07:002007-11-02T10:22:00.000-07:00Sewer magic,I wrote asking your thoughts regarding...Sewer magic,<BR/><BR/>I wrote asking your thoughts regarding 'community issues', not opining about your perception of the behavior of private citizens.<BR/><BR/>Care to try again?<BR/><BR/>Regards, Richard LeGrosRichard LeGroshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15209499066835732066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-10642296782122871832007-11-01T21:39:00.000-07:002007-11-01T21:39:00.000-07:00Magic Man ...While you claim that those listed in ...Magic Man ...<BR/><BR/>While you claim that those listed in Morgan's letter have been threatened, it didn't happen here. Please let us know what happened.<BR/><BR/>It would also be worth addressing all similar situations. For example, would it be reasonable to post a phone number in this forum, encouraging folks to call?Shark Inlethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07308339749797881391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-3649216634887412062007-11-01T20:05:00.000-07:002007-11-01T20:05:00.000-07:00Hi Richard,I can also disagree to the fact that th...Hi Richard,<BR/><BR/>I can also disagree to the fact that the sky is blue. As it turns out, the sky is still blue.<BR/><BR/>I have many community issues I want to discuss--it's widespread.<BR/><BR/>I think a good issue to discuss would be the following:<BR/><BR/>How can a former CSD director negatively oust his constituents, fully endorse the actions of others who have discriminated and threated the people listed in the Timothy Morgan protest letter and continuously insist that they did absolutely nothing wrong at all? Does he not have a conscience?<BR/><BR/>That is a community issue that I want to discuss.Sewer Magichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02460653964012592425noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-75551982311769665012007-10-31T16:44:00.000-07:002007-10-31T16:44:00.000-07:00Hi Sewer Magic,Thank you for taking the time to st...Hi Sewer Magic,<BR/><BR/>Thank you for taking the time to state your opinion. <BR/>I respectfully disagree.<BR/><BR/>Regards, Richard LeGros<BR/><BR/>PS: As you are new to Ann's blog, I assume you have community issues you wish to discuss. Let's hear them. I and other bloggers welcome your thoughts. Whay say you?Richard LeGroshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15209499066835732066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-85628862565821815582007-10-31T13:55:00.000-07:002007-10-31T13:55:00.000-07:00Hi Richard,To say I'm vilifying you would be a red...Hi Richard,<BR/><BR/>To say I'm vilifying you would be a red herring. What you did was wrong, you know that what you did was wrong, I know that what you did was wrong and Ann knows that what you did was wrong.<BR/><BR/>That's the end of that part of the discussion, Richard.<BR/><BR/>If you want a speedy resolution of this project, read my lips: get out of the way.<BR/><BR/>Sewer MagicSewer Magichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02460653964012592425noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-58477006574828669862007-10-31T13:15:00.000-07:002007-10-31T13:15:00.000-07:00Hi Sewer Magic,Obviously you are set in your opini...Hi Sewer Magic,<BR/><BR/>Obviously you are set in your opinion of me (and continued villification) rather than discussing issues. Fine. You are welcome to your opinion. <BR/><BR/>I know what my intent was; and it was not what you believe or blogged.<BR/><BR/>Enough said.<BR/><BR/>As for me, I intent to continue my support of the County's quest to build a WWTF in Los Osos. Just to be clear, I have absolutely no preference where the County locates the treament facility; in town, out of town, on the surface of the moon, where ever. Just remember that every day that the WWTF is not built is adding $40,000 to the project costs; costs that you and PZ property owners will have to pay. Let us all work towards a speedy resolution of this project.<BR/><BR/>Regards, Richard LeGrosRichard LeGroshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15209499066835732066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-51522517608476550962007-10-31T11:58:00.000-07:002007-10-31T11:58:00.000-07:00Richard,Given your previous record, personal quote...Richard,<BR/><BR/>Given your previous record, personal quotes, your personal views of those people listed, your intent says otherwise.<BR/><BR/>As far as I can see, there was no reason for you to place the protest letter in context with the folks supporting that position. That's a nice way of saying, "Get a load of these losers," but given your prior history with those individuals, it clearly shows your actions are vindictive.<BR/><BR/>Again, granted that it's public information, but the presentation and your reputation supersedes any sort of "good intent" on your part. One could reasonably say that if you had any good intent whatsoever, you'd discuss the letter instead of isolating the people who endorsed it.<BR/><BR/>Sewer MagicSewer Magichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02460653964012592425noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-4085833163996448442007-10-31T11:44:00.000-07:002007-10-31T11:44:00.000-07:00The difference between Julie and the Dreamers I kn...The difference between Julie and the Dreamers I know is that they might prefer one sort of project (gravity, Tri-W), but won't fight it if something different is preferred by the majority. <BR/><BR/>That is QUITE a difference.Sewertoons AKA Lynette Tornatzkyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04501351678541088868noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-88088806613073198332007-10-31T10:39:00.000-07:002007-10-31T10:39:00.000-07:00Hi Sewer Magic,The core comment you wrote was: "In...Hi Sewer Magic,<BR/><BR/>The core comment you wrote was:<BR/><BR/> "In my opinion, your actions appeared to be an attempt to incite violence and discrimination against those individuals."<BR/><BR/>You are addressing the INTENT of the deleted post. I can assure you that my intent was soley to inform the community by placing the protest letter in content with the folks supporting that position. I abhor violence. To incite violence was/is not my intent.<BR/><BR/>If you read the deleted blog post you would clearly see that I did not use any adjectives describing the protest letter one way or the other. Further, I also clearly identified as "hearsay needing to be verified" information about the protest letter's author, Mr. Morgan; and did so again without any adjectives pro or con.<BR/><BR/>The bottom line is while reading a post the reader's perception of the post's INTENT is subjective and dependent upon who is reading the post. <BR/><BR/>As you and Ann took offense to the deleted post, your impression that it was done so to incite is the way you perceived it. However, that was not my intent. Additionally, others who read the post did not perceive the post as you or Ann did.<BR/><BR/>As to the location of the post, Ann's site is not of the same ilk as the KKK website (which exists solely to incite violence). <BR/><BR/>So, in the future why not just ask me what my intent was/is before reaching a conclusion which made you react by blogging unpleasant adjectives vilifying me?<BR/><BR/>Regards, Richard LeGrosRichard LeGroshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15209499066835732066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-3285973411690139322007-10-31T10:37:00.000-07:002007-10-31T10:37:00.000-07:00Ron,The problem isn't people insisting on TriW ......Ron,<BR/><BR/>The problem isn't people insisting on TriW ... the problem is people refusing to consider TriW even if TriW comes out on top after thorough consideration.<BR/><BR/>If TriW is really as bad as you say, why spend all that time and effort fighting it when, as you say, less than one person in town wants that site. Why not let the County do their job and figure out what really is best and cheapest?<BR/><BR/>When Julie jumps all over TriW for not completely solving all the problems of aquifer recharge and saltwater intrusion, it is interesting that the TriW plan does a whole lot more toward solving those problems than do the other proposed wastewater solutions. Why should we tolerate her putting her thumbs on the scale?<BR/><BR/><BR/>I think that the history of division in Los Osos is why there is so much mistrust now. Folks who sided with CCLO and the recall are afraid that the Dreamers are going to push for TriW no matter what and the Dreamers are afraid that CCLO folks are going to fight TriW to the death even if it ends up being the cheapest and best option.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Nope, there is still a huge amount of division in Los Osos. If we all, as Ann advocates, calm down and trust the County yet remain careful observers of their process, we'll likely get the best remaining sewer option in terms of bang for buck.Shark Inlethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07308339749797881391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-75621566016871244212007-10-31T10:27:00.000-07:002007-10-31T10:27:00.000-07:00Ron,I can answer your question even though I'm not...Ron,<BR/><BR/>I can answer your question even though I'm not Paavo.<BR/><BR/>On October 23rd, during a recess at the Board of Supervisors meeting, Bruce Gibson told a group of attendees, "When I ran for this seat, I campaigned for the preferred, permitted project and with the 218, people will vote yes. Tri-W and gravity collection will be back in the spotlight. Paavo is committed to [the permitted project] as well."<BR/><BR/>So when people voted yes, this is what they voted for, plain and simple.<BR/><BR/>Sewer MagicSewer Magichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02460653964012592425noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-43125180160781257222007-10-31T09:45:00.000-07:002007-10-31T09:45:00.000-07:00Hmmmmm wrote:"pure Speculation from Ron"O.K. let's...Hmmmmm wrote:<BR/><BR/><I>"pure Speculation from Ron"</I><BR/><BR/>O.K. let's speculate on <I>this</I> -- Now that the Tri-W project isn't funded, it isn't permitted, county documents show it to be the most expensive option, it's the least flexible for future upgrades, it has the highest risk for spills into the estuary, it's slated for ESHA when there are several non-ESHA sites available, and the ONLY reason it was sited downtown was so Los Ososans could easily get to the picnic area, among other embarrassing things, in the sewer plant (oh, that's embarrassing)?<BR/><BR/>Now, let's speculate, again, Hmmmmm, shall we?<BR/><BR/>What percentage of Los Ososans would YOU say demand that the Tri-W project be built these days?<BR/><BR/>More than one percent?<BR/><BR/>Because if that's the case, I haven't seen them. Where are the f are they? Exactly who, these days, is saying things like, "Listen, county officials, I REALLY want a tot lot and an amphitheater in my sewer plant, and I want to be able to walk to them, and I don't care how much it costs or how much environmental damage it does to include a picnic area in the sewer plant. Damn it, I WANT TRI-W!"<BR/><BR/>Who's saying that these days? Anyone? Is there one single person, outside of the bitter and malicious people that developed Tri-W, that's saying that?<BR/><BR/>I don't see one... not <I>one</I>... which absolutely, positively, beyond a shadow of a doubt, shows that your community is clearly NOT divided. Pandora just wants to make it seem that way -- all you anti-sewer obstructionists, you -- just so it gives her something, <I>anything</I>, to point to on why Tri-W is gonzo.<BR/><BR/>"Oh, it was just all those "anti-sewer" people that killed my embarrassing project." <BR/><BR/>See how that works?<BR/><BR/>No, Pandora, as the 218 vote clearly shows, Los Osos isn't anti-sewer, at all. It's "anti-sewer if said sewer plant is going to be jammed in the middle of town for no reason whatsoever other than the initial LOCSD Board, that included Nash-Narner, wanted to cover up the fact that their first project, the one that got them elected and the CSD formed in the first place, failed.<BR/><BR/>So, Hmmmm, let's speculate again: What percentage of Los Ososans would YOU say demand that the Tri-W project be built these days?<BR/><BR/>My guess? .0001% -- the handful of people that developed Tri-W and their ones of supporters.<BR/><BR/>That upcoming community survey on which type and location the community wants is, seriously, one of the most ridiculous things I've ever seen in government.<BR/><BR/>"O.K. Joe-community member, would you rather have this out of town site, or this out of town site, which is right next door to the first one, or this out of town site, which is right next door to the second one?"<BR/><BR/>The stupidest election.... errrrrrr.... survey ever.<BR/><BR/>I wrote about that <A HREF="http://sewerwatch.blogspot.com/2006/11/fourth-times-charm-stupidest-election.html" REL="nofollow">here</A>.<BR/><BR/>And I just sent this e-mail to Paavo Ogren:<BR/><BR/>Hello Paavo,<BR/><BR/>Last November, in an e-mail to me, you wrote:<BR/><BR/>- - -<BR/>"Although many in the community obviously oppose the site (Tri-W), many others still support it."<BR/>- - -<BR/><BR/>Do you still feel that way -- that "many others sill support" the Tri-W site? If so, what are you basing that on? Is there some sort of documentation that shows that, or perhaps public comment? What?<BR/><BR/>Thank you in advance for your prompt response,<BR/>RonRonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14156410299483542733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-4969010181656865432007-10-31T07:11:00.000-07:002007-10-31T07:11:00.000-07:00Ann,I largely agree with you. Except when you sug...Ann,<BR/><BR/>I largely agree with you. Except when you suggest I have done something wrong, of course.<BR/><BR/>Calling Ron a pussy was the result of a well-reasoned ironclad logical line of thought.<BR/><BR/>Ron is also quite welcome to come here and post a reply. In fact, I would love him to come up with a sound explanation for why he now doesn't allow comments on his website. What he told us was weak ... very weak. Furthermore, the timing of the event, along with the comments he deleted give the strong impression that he just couldn't come up with justification for his earlier mis-statements ... or that if he could, he didn't want to bother. This second possibility troubles me even more. If he really cares about Los Osos he would be willing to take the time to finish up discussions he started.<BR/><BR/>No matter, if he wants to be seen as someone who is largely bluster and who refuses to back up his conclusions with facts, that is his choice.<BR/><BR/><BR/>About the "division" in Los Osos ... it is difficult to explain Julie Tacker's comments and the reaction those have caused without using the division. While you tell us about the context and Julie offers her own words up to the Trib and Ron, it still reads like this ... Julie is saying that she's willing to go to great lengths to get her way even if the County makes a well-reasoned choice other than what she wants. Sounds divisive to me. <BR/><BR/>Here's my question for her. What if the County comes up with something that the bulk of the public want and will tackle some of our water issues and that other issues could be solved later. Would she then try to derail things because it's not a complete solution all at once? Would she derail the first and most important step to solving all our water problems just because the 2nd and 3rd steps aren't locked in stone already and super cheap?Shark Inlethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07308339749797881391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-48381801040257732222007-10-31T06:07:00.000-07:002007-10-31T06:07:00.000-07:00Richard sez:"Third, it is a questionable act for y...Richard sez:"Third, it is a questionable act for you to censor ANYBODY on this blog; regardless of content. "<BR/><BR/>No it isn't. This is my blog. If you want to run a blog, go get one of your own. You can then set any rules you like.<BR/><BR/>As Ron noted on his own site, the Tribune's had to shut down many of their sites because of the over-the-line content. Freedom to access a blog site is a privilege, not a right. Abuse the privilege (my rules) and you'll get dumped.<BR/><BR/>As Sewer Magic noted above: "Let's look at the facts. You have an account on both Calhoun's and The Tribune and you post amongst supporters who've made deeply vindictive comments towards three quarters of the people you listed and you have agreed to their sentiments regularly. Given that information, you made the choice of posting the names . . ." <BR/><BR/>TWICE, I might add. I dumped 4Crapkiller for crossing a line. I dumped keepemhonest for crossing the line into pottymouthness, I dumped you for doing a similar thing that 4crapkiller did. That protest letter is like a protest ballot. I was hoping people would have a lick of sense and keep those votes/ballots/protest letters private. Let me repeat again, what's important is the issue the letter raises, not the folks who signed it.<BR/><BR/>Inlet sez:"That's the beauty of blogsites which allow comments and which don't (typically) censor comments Folks who comment can openly challenge the interpretation of evidence and present rebuttal evidence. If folks on both sides are willing to participate in such a reasoned discussion ..., "<BR/><BR/>The key here is "reasoned discussion." That often goes lacking here. For some reason -- must have been a full moon? -- some of you -- once again -- completely lost it. Even Inlet got all miffed that Ron 86'd him and all comments from his blogsite (Ron's decision) and called Ron the "p" word, this from Inlet who demanded I "do something" about people engaging in unacceptable potty-mouth stupidities.<BR/><BR/>Here's the question for some of you. What the hell happened? Full moon? This last run of idiocy was totally out of whack. The election was successful, so no need to chew on each other's ankles over Vote This Way, Vote That Way; the protest letter was full of interesting ISSUES that could have been discussed, ISSUES that the county is, no doubt, working to resolve -- sooner the better -- and the Process is still on track, there is a pretty clear indication that the community has spoken, so what caused this sudden blow-out spate of over-the-top, over-the-line Neener-Neener idiocy? <BR/><BR/>If the Tribune's closed some of their sites because of the ugliness, did some of you Uglies just wander over here to start Neener-Neering? If so, then please go away. <BR/><BR/>Ron's latest posting is absolutely correct. WHAT "division?" According to the little counter/tracker, this blog gets about 4,500 hits a month. This particular entry got about 39 hits, most of them repeats, probably from what? half-dozen of the same people, most all of it Neener-Neener-So's Yo Mamma! <BR/><BR/>I'll ask again what Ron asks: WHAT DIVISION?<BR/><BR/>Get a grip, people.Churadogshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05362538114791652208noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-71933100278814139822007-10-30T20:31:00.000-07:002007-10-30T20:31:00.000-07:00Names not on ROCK site now.Names not on ROCK site now.Sewertoons AKA Lynette Tornatzkyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04501351678541088868noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-7815842933869909212007-10-30T19:49:00.000-07:002007-10-30T19:49:00.000-07:00So ... if those names are available at Ed's websit...So ... if those names are available at Ed's website, shouldn't Ann delete the link to R*ck*fth*C**st.c*m?<BR/><BR/>Seriously, I wonder whether Ann is intending on deleting comments that provide links to other sites with "banned" information. Or, if I provide a link to a site which links to banned information, would I get 86ed?<BR/><BR/>Seriously, I completely support the idea behind Ann's actions. Those who are needlessly rude shouldn't be surprised if they are deleted.<BR/><BR/>On the other hand, I also thought about writing a letter to the Trib the other day, responding to Julie's Viewpoint. Had they required her to provide at least some justification for her statement and had they evaluated whether her evidence backed up her statements and conclusions, it would have been a more solid viewpoint with a bit less rhetoric.<BR/><BR/><BR/>That's the beauty of blogsites which allow comments and which don't (typically) censor comments Folks who comment can openly challenge the interpretation of evidence and present rebuttal evidence. If folks on both sides are willing to participate in such a reasoned discussion (unlike, unfortunately, Ron), the public can benefit.<BR/><BR/>That being said, if Richard and sewertoons are right ... if those names are, indeed, attached to a public protest letter, there is nothing wrong with providing that info. If, on the other hand, these folks are not on the protest letter, they should not be listed as so. Or, if the protest letter is not public ...Shark Inlethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07308339749797881391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-6449944554889798732007-10-30T18:57:00.000-07:002007-10-30T18:57:00.000-07:00Hi Richard,Thanks for welcoming me on the blog.I f...Hi Richard,<BR/><BR/>Thanks for welcoming me on the blog.<BR/><BR/>I find your recently deleted post to be "digital lynching" for the following reasons:<BR/><BR/>While the information is public and everyone has a right to see it, there was no reason to post those names standalone. With Jena Six, all the white supremacists had to do was to look up the address and the phone number of the Jena Six defendants in the Yellow Book. Was that public information? Sure. Was it right to post it? Absolutely not.<BR/><BR/>Let's look at the facts. You have an account on both Calhoun's and The Tribune and you post amongst supporters who've made deeply vindictive comments towards three quarters of the people you listed and you have agreed to their sentiments regularly. Given that information, you made the choice of posting the names on here.<BR/><BR/>In my opinion, your actions appeared to be an attempt to incite violence and discrimination against those individuals.Sewer Magichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02460653964012592425noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-16279934999442220332007-10-30T18:46:00.000-07:002007-10-30T18:46:00.000-07:00sewertoons,I just checked the site to see if the n...sewertoons,<BR/><BR/>I just checked the site to see if the names were listed on the article and I didn't see them. <BR/><BR/>Are you related to Maria Kelly?Sewer Magichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02460653964012592425noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-38134970590423603312007-10-30T18:33:00.000-07:002007-10-30T18:33:00.000-07:00The names can be found on the ROCK website: Rockof...The names can be found on the ROCK website: RockoftheCoast.com<BR/><BR/>Why hasn't Ed Ochs seen fit to delete the names? No reason maybe?<BR/><BR/>sewer magic, are you related to keepmhonest?Sewertoons AKA Lynette Tornatzkyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04501351678541088868noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-31478225666238182162007-10-30T18:29:00.000-07:002007-10-30T18:29:00.000-07:00HI mike,The answer to your question is yes.Regards...HI mike,<BR/><BR/>The answer to your question is yes.<BR/><BR/>Regards, Richard LeGrosRichard LeGroshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15209499066835732066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-84973337226766488532007-10-30T18:26:00.000-07:002007-10-30T18:26:00.000-07:00HI Sewer Magic,I see you are new to this blog. Wel...HI Sewer Magic,<BR/><BR/>I see you are new to this blog. Welcome!<BR/><BR/>I respect your right to your opinion that my posts are a 'digital lynching'; while I am a bit confused that the specific intent of your post seems to be attempting exactly that regarding me. <BR/><BR/>Anyway, I will gladly discuss issues with you, sans anger.<BR/><BR/>Regards, Richard LeGrosRichard LeGroshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15209499066835732066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-8550026108152297472007-10-30T18:23:00.000-07:002007-10-30T18:23:00.000-07:00Maybe a spread sheet of each of the participants i...Maybe a spread sheet of each of the participants in each of the lawsuits could be generated... compare ALL lawsuits and ALL those who have stepped forward to sue the State and the various CSD Boards... Would we see only a handful of the same names...???Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06093426896476666691noreply@blogger.com