tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post2863190709161312904..comments2023-10-28T03:14:44.519-07:00Comments on Calhouns Can(n)ons: NewsstandGreghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04099049885765768069noreply@blogger.comBlogger176125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-30978184267356026472008-10-15T15:18:00.000-07:002008-10-15T15:18:00.000-07:00Ron,What's important here is that people beyond th...Ron,<BR/><BR/>What's important here is that people beyond this blog now know that Shark Inlet is Steve Rein. <BR/><BR/>It's time, as one blogger put out there, for the Shark Inlet era come to an END. And it's come with a whimper. <BR/><BR/>Rein cries like the victim here: "I do seem to have a history of poking bullies with a stick and sometimes they play dirty."<BR/><BR/>Disgusting! Rein is obviously unrepentant, doesn't "get it" and never will. So here it is, one more time, for Steve Rein's sake, served up to him on a silver platter.<BR/><BR/>REIN: YOU ARE THE BULLY, NOT THE VICTIM! YOU PLAY DIRTY, THE DIRTBAG IS YOU!!! Y-O-U!!!<BR/><BR/>OK, Steve???? Got it NOW??? However, if you STILL DON'T "GET IT," don't hesitate to call Ann again and beg like the weenie you really are behind the mask of "Shark Inlet" ... and maybe, for old time's sake, she will shed a tear for the poor, toothless Shark, and take down those awful truthful words ... especially after the way you have treated her ... and many others who only stopped here for a moment to drink from the well of intelligence and fair play ... and got YOU INSTEAD!!!<BR/><BR/>Rein really doesn't look so smart anymore, standing naked and exposed, does he? Pathological liar, lobbyist, angry hacker, wimp and whiner, now laughingstock -- someone only Richard and Gordon could love because they, too, like Rein, are common criminals killing time awaiting justice.<BR/><BR/>Steve Rein now joins his cheap, low-life "heroes" in the Los Osos Hall of Shame. No wonder he defends them like one of his own!<BR/><BR/>No reasonable person should ever be naive here ever again and engage Rein without first understanding you are attempting to communicate with someone who is basically CERTIFIABLY INSANE for what he believes in. There is no sense in trying to find a way in to his one-note brain. Rein lives in a perpetual state of denial. Make no mistake about it. Steve Rein is a dangerous, even potentially violent person (like several other Dreamers) who could snap at any moment. Because of all the bad things he has said in the past to people as "Shark Inlet," because he lives in a bubble world that is bursting all over him, and because he knows better than anyone what he's said and done to people over the years as "Shark Inlet," outing Rein makes him very explosive. No one knows how far he might go. We now know how far he went and, regardless of any lame philosophical reason he might cough up, WHAT HE DID WAS ALREADY WAY TOO EXTREME!!!<BR/><BR/>Rein says he hasn't practiced hackery for 10 years ago and it's all in the past, but here he is in Los Osos doing exactly the same thing in did at VCU because, guess what, folks, STEVE REIN HASN'T CHANGED ONE IOTA!!! HE'S STILL THE SAME ROTTEN COWARD HE ALWAYS WAS!!!<BR/><BR/>Can you believe the guy responsible for all this 24/7 hate blogging is a Cal Poly Professor??? It boggles the mind. Shame on Cal Poly!!! SHAME ON CAL POLY!!!<BR/><BR/>Since Rein himself brought up his parenting philosophies as justification for his viciousness toward fellow Christians, I think it's only fair to question his parenting practices based on his blogging activities:<BR/><BR/>He blogs all days, blogs all nights, blogs at home, blogs at work ... has a wife, four kids, and a cute little dog ... is a professor of statistics (???) at Cal Poly ... does bits of work for CalTrans and DWR ... and STILL has tons of FREE TIME ... time to blog ... time to attack ... time to hate ... time to hack. Whatever his parenting philosophy is or isn't, I could care less, but his Internet obsessions are inexplicable ... and DOWNRIGHT CREEPY.<BR/><BR/>Rein, as a good Christian, must have missed the Sunday School Lesson that went something like: "WHATEVER YOU REAP, SO SHALL YE SOW"!<BR/><BR/>That Sunday he must have been blogging.Howiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06812806894669430895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-18082424210410348992008-10-14T22:45:00.000-07:002008-10-14T22:45:00.000-07:00Mark,The proper quote is "Don't it always seem to ...Mark,<BR/><BR/>The proper quote is <BR/><BR/><I>"Don't it always seem to go<BR/>That you don't know what you've got<BR/>Till it's gone<BR/>They Paved Paradise<BR/>and put up a parking lot"</I><BR/><BR/>Big Yellow Taxi<BR/>by Joni MitchellShark Inlethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07308339749797881391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-6213414308274187632008-10-14T22:35:00.000-07:002008-10-14T22:35:00.000-07:00Sewer,Take your meds and get some rest.Sewer,<BR/><BR/>Take your meds and get some rest.GetRealOsoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11936638912249439168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-46684222604676421762008-10-14T22:34:00.000-07:002008-10-14T22:34:00.000-07:00Mark,The hard core Dreamers want our homes and the...Mark,<BR/><BR/>The hard core Dreamers want our homes and the County wants our water.<BR/><BR/>Again, it's a shame that God didn't give the Dreamers any brains.<BR/><BR/>They don't listen to the real experts, never have.<BR/><BR/>No brains.GetRealOsoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11936638912249439168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-39650267447542340432008-10-14T21:50:00.000-07:002008-10-14T21:50:00.000-07:00Answer Shark's question mark.Answer Shark's question mark.Sewertoons AKA Lynette Tornatzkyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04501351678541088868noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-28283354498104267132008-10-14T21:12:00.000-07:002008-10-14T21:12:00.000-07:00Getrealosos,I agree with you regarding the constan...Getrealosos,<BR/><BR/>I agree with you regarding the constant chatter coming from sss, Lynette and MIKE.<BR/><BR/>These folks don't have a clue how good LO/BP has it with their own drinking water aquifer. But the like most people "They won't know what they have until it is gone".<BR/><BR/>The Nitrate problem could be solved using technology like Ion Exchange while preserving that lovely aquifer.<BR/><BR/>Many utilities, cities and special districts rely on Basin Water every day to help them meet their clean water needs. Basin Water has over 30 million gallons per day of installed capacity using this patented design. Unit capacities range from 300 gpm (gallons per minute) to over 2,000 gpm. With headquarters in Rancho Cucamonga, Calif., Basin Water (www.basinwater.com) is a privately held water treatment and services company with experienced professionals dedicated to delivering cost-effective and reliable water treatment systems and services to municipal, industrial, and governmental customers worldwide. <BR/><BR/>Time to think outside of the box...<BR/><BR/>Can the community really afford not to?Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12745418296700849040noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-40955447586591775042008-10-14T20:56:00.000-07:002008-10-14T20:56:00.000-07:00Real,Your post (above) makes no sense and certainl...Real,<BR/><BR/>Your post (above) makes no sense and certainly isn't true.<BR/><BR/>I said I would no longer respond Cal Poly Professor/hacker Steve. I'm not leaving this blog -- are you kidding?<BR/><BR/>Maria made a misstatement. You are (obviously) only trying to cover for her.<BR/><BR/>The 218 was blackmail - 30% didn't vote on something that would affect their pocketbook. The 218 is a law and had absolutely NOTHING TO DO WITH OPTION OR LOCATION OF OUR SEWER! THE COUNTY HAD $6 MILLION TO LOOK AT OPTION/LOCATION. Get real, Realistic. Stop the ridiculous spin.<BR/><BR/>P.S. Why don't you ask your friend (Maria) why she removed her earlier post? We will have to assume that she removed it because it was a misstatement of fact.<BR/><BR/>Thanks, you have a good evening too.GetRealOsoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11936638912249439168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-56552086605267558942008-10-14T18:58:00.000-07:002008-10-14T18:58:00.000-07:00AB2701 would have been moot if the property owners...AB2701 would have been moot if the property owners hadn't assessed themselves, because it was the only way the County would agree to take on the project.<BR/><BR/>The overwhelming victory of the 218 was evidence of the property owner's desire to see someone else in charge of the project.<BR/><BR/>Agree, disagree. I really don't care.<BR/><BR/>Whatever happened to you not repsonding directly to anyone ever again? Just can't help yourself, I guess.<BR/><BR/>Have a wonderful evening.Realistic1https://www.blogger.com/profile/09260966115098379875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-64926510373192509702008-10-14T18:49:00.000-07:002008-10-14T18:49:00.000-07:00No Real,You're wrong. That's what AB2701 d...No Real,<BR/><BR/>You're wrong. That's what AB2701 did.<BR/><BR/>That's what Pandora & Group asked the County to do for them. Take it out of the hands of the new CSD (right at the time of the successful recall election) and have the County take the project away!... all in secret of course.<BR/><BR/>Again, it's a shame that God didn't give you Dreamers any brains.GetRealOsoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11936638912249439168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-29700600252285574562008-10-14T18:24:00.000-07:002008-10-14T18:24:00.000-07:00grlo:You said "The 218 vote was a vote to tax ours...grlo:<BR/><BR/>You said "The 218 vote was a vote to tax ourselves. Nothing more, nothing less (a blank check at that)."<BR/><BR/>Wrong. It was something more. It was a referendum by the property owners to get the project out of the hands of the incompetent post recall board.<BR/><BR/>Deal with it.Realistic1https://www.blogger.com/profile/09260966115098379875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-66742668950091374622008-10-14T18:22:00.000-07:002008-10-14T18:22:00.000-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Realistic1https://www.blogger.com/profile/09260966115098379875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-38777388281478088032008-10-14T17:50:00.000-07:002008-10-14T17:50:00.000-07:00Mark,Forget about Shark. You can't reason with a p...Mark,<BR/><BR/>Forget about Shark. You can't reason with a paid lobbyist. Besides, he's the expert on changing the subject and never addressing the facts.<BR/><BR/>Shark said a "no" 218 vote would have stopped the County cold. He's right about that. But that is beside the point. The County had $6 million to spend on whatever they wanted (mostly spent on Corolla and anti-step mailers).<BR/><BR/>That's why the RWQCB had to hand out some CDO's and NOV's and threats of fines to blackmail the town into voting yes. Governmental agencies working hand and hand torwards the same agenda. Indeed, it happens to be the same agenda that Maria has. Tri-W/Gravity.<BR/><BR/>What a scam it all is, but Lynette and Shark fight every single day on the blogs for it! That's their job.GetRealOsoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11936638912249439168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-49664323838392135582008-10-14T17:35:00.000-07:002008-10-14T17:35:00.000-07:00Maria's response to the 218 statement was quite a ...Maria's response to the 218 statement was quite a stretch.<BR/><BR/>The 218 vote was a vote to tax ourselves. Nothing more, nothing less (a blank check at that).<BR/><BR/>It took Maria days to try to explain her (mis)statement. Again, quite a stretch on her part!<BR/><BR/>The County had $6 million to start with. That's a lot of money to play with and do what they want. I think the County had more than enough to study out of town sites.<BR/><BR/>Obviously, Maria made a misstatement and had to cover it up. Of course she has her campaign manager, Sewertoons and Lobbyist, Shark, to try to cover up her mistakes. They're always there for her. Hmmmmm.<BR/><BR/>Why DID Maria remove her (earlier) post on this subject?<BR/><BR/>P.S. Maria made another misstatement which she doesn't care to clear up. Maria LIED at least two times (on camera) about Karen, Piper, Mary, and others claiming as fact that they "no sewer" people. Why can't she answer that?GetRealOsoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11936638912249439168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-81424741542755337862008-10-14T17:14:00.000-07:002008-10-14T17:14:00.000-07:00mark, why won't you answer Shark's question?mark, why won't you answer Shark's question?Sewertoons AKA Lynette Tornatzkyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04501351678541088868noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-68043737287081614692008-10-14T15:47:00.000-07:002008-10-14T15:47:00.000-07:00Lynnette, your thoughts on Maria running "away", w...Lynnette, your thoughts on Maria running "away", will be appreciated. <BR/>After all she is still your buddy, isn't she?<BR/><BR/>Do you eat with that mouth?Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12745418296700849040noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-45314025213839342032008-10-14T15:30:00.000-07:002008-10-14T15:30:00.000-07:00mark, stop being an ass, answer Shark's question.B...mark, stop being an ass, answer Shark's question.<BR/><BR/>Bombarding the blog with your lengthy diatribe adds nothing to this discussion, but simply illustrates your unwillingness to answer even a simple question. But that has been your pattern all along, hasn't it.Sewertoons AKA Lynette Tornatzkyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04501351678541088868noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-61319872443141409532008-10-14T15:20:00.000-07:002008-10-14T15:20:00.000-07:00Geez Maria,Why did you remove your post? Not very ...Geez Maria,<BR/><BR/>Why did you remove your post? Not very responsible behavior, indeed. <BR/><BR/>Befitting of a perspiring politician but not a workable strategy for an aspiring politician. <BR/><BR/>Maybe it can be chalked up to the full moon tonight…<BR/><BR/>Lynnette, your thoughts on Maria running "away", will be appreciated. <BR/>After all she is still your buddy, isn't she?<BR/><BR/>sss feel free on this one as well.<BR/><BR/>I wouldn't want to vote for someone so volatile, would you? If so, why?Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12745418296700849040noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-8729058393625105232008-10-14T14:59:00.000-07:002008-10-14T14:59:00.000-07:00After all these are answered Lynnette:Questions St...After all these are answered Lynnette:<BR/><BR/>Questions Steve Rein refused to answer:<BR/><BR/>1. Legality aside, do you think it is morally or ethically acceptable for anyone to enter back sectors and password protected areas of a corporate computer, browse through files, take very specific information not made readily available to the public or linked as a viewable page, and then download and pass the information on to others?<BR/><BR/>2. For absolute clarity, are you asserting that you have never entered password or non-password protected areas of the GFI computers or that you never downloaded files from nonpublic areas of GFI computers and passed them (or their URLs) to another party?<BR/><BR/>3. Did you access and download or retrieve in any form, guestbook information from GFI computers?<BR/><BR/>4. In Christianity Today, (November 13, 2000) your name appears in an article written by Kathleen Terner clearly stating that "GFI asked legal authorities to take criminal action against Rein." <BR/><BR/>We were not made aware of this event from GFI or any other source (either publicly or privately) until Christianity Today made it public. Do you know how CT obtained this information? If you did not provide it, did you make a written protest to Christianity Today for bringing this issue to <BR/>public awareness implicating you in something possibly worthy of criminal charges?<BR/><BR/>5. Are you aware of any documentation or meetings noting that VCU took administrative actions against you or that VCU exonerated you in light of GFI claims relating to an unauthorized entry into password protected areas of their computers?<BR/><BR/>6. Are you maintaining that VCU did not request that you remove your "RedRhino" site from their computers in response to GFl claims against you?<BR/><BR/>7. Would you please clarify for us the circumstances surrounding your departure from VCU? What date did you officially resign from VCU? If you did not resign, was your contract just not renewed for some reason? What was the reason? You mentioned that you were hoping to relocate back to the west coast closer to family. If you resigned due to taking another job, we would really appreciate seeing a copy of your resignation letter or whatever documented evidence you have to notify VCU that you would not be returning. If your contract was not renewed, please provide the date that VCU notified you. Did you know that your contract was not being renewed before you decided to look for another job?<BR/><BR/>8. Please explain in detail how you came in possession of two versions of a letter concerning Roy Maynard which were in the GFI computer. Did you pass that information to Kathy Nesper, or anyone else? Were/are you co-owner of the PAM list with Kathy Nesper?<BR/><BR/>9. Are you saying that you did not meet with VCU officials or anyone else concerning the GFI claim against you?<BR/><BR/>10. Have you at any time notified the Ezzos of information to be posted on your site which may have impugned their character or their ministry efforts to find out if your information was correct? Did you ever ask them for the other side of the story on any specific issue? Please list those topics which you have listed on your site that you have discussed with the Ezzos before your post.<BR/><BR/>11. Would you please give us a prepared statement as to why you feel it is necessary to have the ezzoinfo website along with your biblical justification for your site.<BR/><BR/>12. Are you denying that your Red Rhino site which contained your personal information about the Ezzos was on VCU computers? Please quote the VCU guidelines regarding the use of their computers that gave you permission to use them for your own personal, non-university related purposes <BR/>related to accessing the GFI computers and downloading information that was not made public or linked to a viewable page.Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12745418296700849040noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-29904596702432952592008-10-14T14:57:00.000-07:002008-10-14T14:57:00.000-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12745418296700849040noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-77327944529948536922008-10-14T14:34:00.000-07:002008-10-14T14:34:00.000-07:00How about mark answering Sharks question?How about mark answering Sharks question?Sewertoons AKA Lynette Tornatzkyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04501351678541088868noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-12906899047648803052008-10-14T13:45:00.000-07:002008-10-14T13:45:00.000-07:00Mike writes,"I work at a law firm that specializes...Mike writes,<BR/><BR/>"I work at a law firm that specializes in consumer class actions and we are investigating Intelius. I'd like to hear from others who have had these same experiences with Intelius. Please email me, abby1100ny@cmht.com."<BR/><BR/>Mike stole the line from <A HREF="http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/unauthorized-charges-c73293.html" REL="nofollow">this site</A>.<BR/><BR/>From the site:<BR/><BR/><I>I work at a law firm that specializes in consumer class actions and we are investigating Intelius. I'd like to hear from others who have had these same experiences with Intelius. Please email me, abby1100ny@cmht.com.<BR/><BR/>Thanks,<BR/>Abigail</I><BR/><BR/>There were not any credit card problems. Intelius was fine.<BR/><BR/>Go home, Mike.Osos Changehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05316645018223542172noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-42891758005123904702008-10-14T12:38:00.000-07:002008-10-14T12:38:00.000-07:00sss,You are sssuch a good county government commer...sss,<BR/>You are sssuch a good county government commercial.<BR/><BR/>How's your RL and his merry Board "not doing a 218" chatter?Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12745418296700849040noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-43785145478600062832008-10-14T12:03:00.000-07:002008-10-14T12:03:00.000-07:00Mark,No, I am not saying that. Maybe you should r...Mark,<BR/><BR/>No, I am not saying that. Maybe you should re-read what I wrote. Even so, I will address the issue you raise.<BR/><BR/>The County budgeted only so much toward the project before the required buy in from us. To study sites enough to get an EIR required more than than the County was willing to commit without a 218. Thus, while it wasn't written into AB2701, the 218 was necessary if we wanted to move forward with the County.<BR/><BR/>I would that someone who was moderately following events and who could put two and two together would be able to grok that one.<BR/><BR/>It would also be nice if you answer the question I posed to you ... how would a no result on the 218 help get an out of town treatment plant? At face value, the explanation you've been offered makes much sense and unless you explain how a no vote would promote out of town any better than yes, there is no reason to continue this discussion because it would be little more than a back-n-forth with both of us simply repeating what we've already written at least two times. That being said, are you gonna chose to move the discussion forward or should we let it die because you aren't gonna explain why you think what you seem to think?Shark Inlethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07308339749797881391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-65015766837814485522008-10-14T11:54:00.000-07:002008-10-14T11:54:00.000-07:00sss,Ssso you are sssaying that AB 2701 provided la...sss,<BR/><BR/>Ssso you are sssaying that AB 2701 provided law that a sssucessful 218 is a prerequiste to ssstudying sssites?<BR/>If ssso please cut and paste that language for me please.Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12745418296700849040noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-24607225994284948492008-10-14T11:36:00.000-07:002008-10-14T11:36:00.000-07:00Gee mark, were you there at the forum last night? ...Gee mark, were you there at the forum last night? Did you submit your question? Did you go up to Maria before or after the panel and just ASK HER? Why, no you didn't!<BR/><BR/>Quit whining. I think 3 of us now have given you explanations; you just refuse to understand as you seem have some other "truth" you are trying to make stick.Sewertoons AKA Lynette Tornatzkyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04501351678541088868noreply@blogger.com