tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post3306363183768557951..comments2023-10-28T03:14:44.519-07:00Comments on Calhouns Can(n)ons: End Game, Part Two? Three?NewsstandGreghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04099049885765768069noreply@blogger.comBlogger69125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-28419047216936068852010-12-23T07:09:20.211-08:002010-12-23T07:09:20.211-08:00It's interesting to note, at this time of the ...It's interesting to note, at this time of the season, the numerous wastewater gravity system spills across the nation, and the tons of raw sewage spilled into our streams, rivers and oceans.<br /><br />Some figure it is enough to keep Niagara Falls gushing annually for about 10 days. <br /><br />Yet, out water-board demands we use a system with a "proven track record", according to Mr. Briggs.<br /><br />Well, the deep trenched gravity system sure as hell has a proven record.<br /><br />Without a doubt, the gravity system is a revenue generating system for the State.FOGSWAMPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14094960232554363985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-2156217818317489922010-12-22T17:09:42.845-08:002010-12-22T17:09:42.845-08:00On the same page somewhat, Chris. We have learned ...On the same page somewhat, Chris. We have learned that no sewer is perfect. (Example=100% Broderson remains in my mind an excessive Amt, see re Legros comments)<br />Hm... I'll avoid rephrasing that, but I meant "any sewer". (Darn! thats not quite it either!)<br />You should know that I helped stop that 2005 Sewer. At the time I certainly did not appreciate the regulatory hurdles. Later I was relatively much more instramental in stoping the Tonini Sprayfields, and more learned, even predicting the CCC objections. <br />It may not be the same as your point, or relevant to you, but having been through it, part of my point is that "The group" was composed of individuals, each of whom played different parts in removing the slim possibility of a (somewhat?) cheaper system as an alternative.<br />A different mix (even including one or two of the listed), may had gotten the Job done. IMHOAlon Perlmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00155776897189144501noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-77545635541168819612010-12-22T15:37:21.187-08:002010-12-22T15:37:21.187-08:00Alon,
You write: "Lesson Number 3: In hindsi...Alon,<br /><br />You write: "Lesson Number 3: In hindsight, en toto, 20/20; this was not a board who could build any sewer if handed to them on a silver platter."<br /><br />Nicely put. I love the subtle way you juxtapose the skill of the old board to produce a project that protected our community with the incompetence of Shicker-Tacker-Sesena-Senet-Fouch.<br /><br />All water down the toilet now. Hopefully our new Board can find a way to pay the debts Shicker-Tacker-Sesena-Senet-Fouch stuck us with. <br /><br />Ho, ho,ho-ing with you, not at you.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17207967371183972798noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-78684605150648743632010-12-22T12:53:57.224-08:002010-12-22T12:53:57.224-08:00Best for last; WHAT I KNOW-I do monitor progressio...Best for last; WHAT I KNOW-I do monitor progression of the "Midtown site" and the surround on a regular basis. So you bet I was there Monday while it was raining, and Tuesday took a hike post rains (Subsurface collecting phase) to observe directly timed flows through the basin. (Fred Dellagata (LOCAC Traffic and Circ. Chair) was there with me too and we observed that erosion was close to the curb of LOVR roadway and he notified the County).<br />Last year (January close to the CCC Los Osos WWTP?) there were three (25 year event) successive storms. I rushed back at the ending of the third Storm in time to find the rupture of the final remnants of George Milanese retention pond. Note to self; “Was the Palisades Drainage project completed? Think so”).<br /> So this Monday, there was “A river runs through it” in the location I thought it would, and on Tuesday in the lull (as I already predicted); the TRI-W fenced portion retained NO standing or flowing water. Not quite “Dry as a bone” but close to it.<br />Where does it go? it actually, this year, worked its way out from the area, without collecting. all the way down Pine and the West edge of the Trailer park where it and the “ lower Broderson “ flows went neatly into the West Sweet Springs Marsh-and the national estuary if carrying a Sewer spill. But not a disaster to Sweet Springs spring and ponds. I’m not sure if the County included Giacomazzi at the time they stated “highest risk”.<br /><br />I confirmed that last year- this year is Insurance. Your other two “citizen” experts you know- Julie T. identified Willows inside TW fence and Linde Owens knows a lot about the property and has made good public comments about vehicles entering the ESHA, but Linde can’t be shaken from believing that “Overflows at T-W, would go to Sweet Springs” understood to be meaning the ponds slightly east. It’s a sewer activist thing.Alon Perlmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00155776897189144501noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-87067386792674900422010-12-22T12:44:00.677-08:002010-12-22T12:44:00.677-08:00Thanks Ron, you opened the Flood Gates. I’m going ...Thanks Ron, you opened the Flood Gates. I’m going to repost this to your Blog<br />- Without re-researching-without clear context to the statements etc... top of my head -what I think and what I know. <br />I think the Infeasibility of disposal plan had the 100% Broderson element. I think Legros once said on this blog; the 100% Broderson was temporary to the project start and some would be shunted elsewhere. Disposal issues appear in CCC documents throughout the developments of projects. I personally was in active opposition to Broderson until Rob Miller reduced it. Also Tri-W did include tertiary (Along with high maintenance and negative pressure building for odor control, also there was on-site disposal/ grounds maintenance component inconsistent with the location's being a low collecting spot. (On the other hand if you had to have it in-town, the gravity collection is correct. And on the other- other hand bringing your rainwater/stormwater into the same exact spot as your Sewer plant has consequences that seem un-designed into many of the area's Sewer systems- (MB. Avila Creek). But....The County got the 2ndary treated application part wrong- CCC corrected that. <br />I'm not sure it can't handle slightly more than the 450 AFY but the numbers are locked in now. And any number would have to be dependent on continuous safety monitoring and a reserve capacity to STOP flows, "If".<br />The 0% Broderson suggested by some, even to this day, is even more impractical.Alon Perlmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00155776897189144501noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-69201602782631536122010-12-22T09:38:02.171-08:002010-12-22T09:38:02.171-08:00Alon writes:
"Tri-W... Social unfeasibility;...Alon writes:<br /><br /><i>"Tri-W... Social unfeasibility;- not Technical...</i>"<br /><br />That's not accurate.<br /><br />The disposal system was also "infeasible."<br /><br />According to the County: "... the infeasible status of the LOCSD disposal plan..."<br /><br />In other words, it wasn't going to work as planned.<br /><br />And, according to the county, Tri-W posed the "highest" risk for spills into the National Estuary.<br /><br />Just curious: Did the Tri-W site just happen to collect a drop or two of water during these storms?Ronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14156410299483542733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-3416621064728925412010-12-21T18:52:58.609-08:002010-12-21T18:52:58.609-08:00Well said Alon.Well said Alon.FOGSWAMPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14094960232554363985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-46595811859113229102010-12-21T10:38:22.989-08:002010-12-21T10:38:22.989-08:00There were several Pre-Recall CSD PR components th...There were several Pre-Recall CSD PR components that failed; The arrival of reality-The starkness of the cleared ESHA where deer roamed a month prior. The Hunnihuts. "Trust the truth".(maybe the last one was just me). But; It was the extra month(s) that allowed the "Recall organization" to solidify that lead to the Recalls or more importantly the passage of Measure 'B" (A legally binding measure, for long enough to reach the no-return point).<br /><br />The Post Recall board? I spent about 2-3 years watching them directly in action in meetings, between meetings, during meeting breaks, at the committee meetings far from the cameras;<br />Learned 3 things- 1. Each director is an individual and brought their own individual capabilities, disabilities and notions of responsibilities. As they matured or failed to mature in to their roles and learn the functions and limitations of the organization.<br />2. There are certain constraints and paths that responsible CSD directors can follow as they work their way through regulatory and mundane directorial duties (including fiscal responsibilities) to accomplishing their goals. Call it "CSD 101".<br />As I learned more and more about CSD Staff Manager interactions, (as if I was auditing the class) it became apparent that some of the directors were not going to pass their final exams.<br />During the first two years it was easy to for me blame the outside agencies. Then I woke up. Unfortunately, for a few directors the "exclusively blame" path continues to this day.<br />In a healthy CSD the public is the Sixth Director.<br />In the post Recall CSD the "public" Ranked fifth, somewhere behind Director Gail and Director Al.<br />It was easy to rationalize, (In the first two years) even the clearly questionable actions of the post-recall board, to be due to the individual pressures (Including Lawsuits).<br /><br />Lesson Number 3: In hindsight, en toto, 20/20; this was not a board who could build any sewer if handed to them on a silver platter.<br />Yeall may differ.<br /><br />Midtown? (Heh Heh- I mean Tri-W) Remains an Odd location as far as land use. But given the final cost and the shape of the collection system? <br />Social unfeasibility;- not Technical or monetary infeasibility.<br />It’s a wash, (Literally and figuratively).Alon Perlmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00155776897189144501noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-39719590742219389632010-12-21T06:36:31.383-08:002010-12-21T06:36:31.383-08:00GRO sez:"It was the State Water Board loaning...GRO sez:"It was the State Water Board loaning out all that money with an unsecured loan that allowed the recalled board to start that very STUPID project a month early (so there would be no turning back of course!)<br /><br />Remember Stan saying, "WE LEFT YOU WITH NOTHING -- no money!!"<br /><br />Irony: I'm pretty sure that if the CSD had NOT started that project before the recall, the recall would have failed. <br /><br />But here's one thing I'm absolutely sure of: No responsible elected CSD official who actually cared more about this community than about their own wounded egos would ever, ever, EVER have gambled that unsecured SRF money on a scorched-earth policy by setting the recall election date as late as possible (as Gordo stated, he was not inclined to help people trying to get him out of office (that old ego) by starting that project before the recall election. Not ever.Churadogshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17701649330085709021noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-34355027216011545822010-12-20T19:12:49.972-08:002010-12-20T19:12:49.972-08:00Chris,
You say, "It wasn't starting the ...Chris,<br /><br />You say, "It wasn't starting the project that devistated the community it was stopping the project with no workable plan."<br /><br />Problem with that is the RECALLED board had already sunk over $3 into the project.<br /><br />We could have moved ahead with Ripley, and moved the sewer out of town (to the same place it will now be.)<br /><br />It was the State Water Board loaning out all that money with an unsecured loan that allowed the recalled board to start that very STUPID project a month early (so there would be no turning back of course!)<br /><br />Remember Stan saying, "WE LEFT YOU WITH NOTHING -- no money!!"<br /><br />But, obviously the State Water Board wanted Tri-W and wanted MWH even though they aren't to dictate what system we select.<br /><br />I personally saw a memo from the State Water board requesting Steve Highland (of MWH) sit in on a meeting with them. This memo was to Blakeslee. Why?<br /><br />I believe it's because MWH has been handing out money to many. That's what they do. <br /><br />And also remember (and by the way, this is not a rumor! -- Blakeslee was taking MWH's calls all during his AB2701.)<br /><br />Nope, you don't want to admit it, but it was the recalled board's fault for the financial mess that we're in -- with a little help from the State Water Board.GetRealOsoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11936638912249439168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-65589289848114943812010-12-20T10:08:20.550-08:002010-12-20T10:08:20.550-08:00Ann,
Nice try old gal, but the harder you try to ...Ann,<br /><br />Nice try old gal, but the harder you try to divert attention from the failure of the Shicker-Tacker-Sesena-Senet-Fouche board, the dumber you look.<br /><br />It wasn't starting the project that devistated the community it was stopping the project with no workable plan. <br /><br />The project is a done deal. I hope you spent the last 5 years wisely saving up to pay...and pay...and pay for Shicker-Tacker-Sesena-Senet-Fouche "Move the Sewer" fiasco.<br /><br />Laughing at you, not with you.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17207967371183972798noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-20799417741958005362010-12-20T09:32:16.930-08:002010-12-20T09:32:16.930-08:00I will agree with you GRO... time to clear out the...I will agree with you GRO... time to clear out the riff raff and wipe out those silly 25 ft wide lots, trailer trash and that ugly "town" center so I can have jeffie build me and my friends some 5,000 to 20,000 sq ft mansions around a real golf course... Yup, GRO, you are right on target there... We also are planning on toll gates like 17 mile drive... gotta keep out the riff raff.... It's all in our PLAN... There will be 2 acre lot minimums so WE won't need no stinkin' sewer... Gotta love it when all the planning comes together... Thanks Gail, Lisa, Ann, Al and Julie... and thanks to YOU too GRO... we couldn't get control of LO without folks like you...!!!!Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06093426896476666691noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-16051526528134946122010-12-20T09:20:27.548-08:002010-12-20T09:20:27.548-08:00Mike (Richard),
One more thing:
You say that thi...Mike (Richard),<br /><br />One more thing:<br /><br />You say that this is a rumor? <br /><br />If the State Water Board had not loaned out the first installment of the UNSECURED loan then Stan, Richard, and Gordon couldn't have started the project at all.<br /><br />Sure Richard!GetRealOsoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11936638912249439168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-69503914737009002092010-12-20T09:18:48.427-08:002010-12-20T09:18:48.427-08:00Mike (Richard),
Yes, you'd sure say I spread ...Mike (Richard),<br /><br />Yes, you'd sure say I spread rumors.<br /><br />Yes, I know a very expensive sewer is coming. I never said otherwise.<br /><br />I'm saying that it didn't have to be so expensive. Period. You know it, we all know it.<br /><br />It's a land grab to get everyone out so the developers can move in to re-build Los Osos to what Pandora wants it to look like. No riff-raff for her! No seniors for Van Burden, Starlings, etc.<br /><br />Yes, I have good friends who aren't stupid by any means. <br /><br />I have given more FACTS and information than you'd like (that's obvious). But I like to see you go off the top, I have to admit that.<br /><br />P.S. Where's your good, loyal friend Lynette? ... taking time off for the holidays?GetRealOsoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11936638912249439168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-79948990403495124152010-12-20T08:58:54.378-08:002010-12-20T08:58:54.378-08:00THE BOTTOMLINE IS THAT A VERY EXPENSIVE SEWER IS H...THE BOTTOMLINE IS THAT A VERY EXPENSIVE SEWER IS HEADED INTO LOS OSOS WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT...!!!!<br /><br />...and GRO, I seriously doubt that YOU have ANY friends...!!!! You don't ever actually KNOW anything about sewers and the Tri-W Plan, ONLY hearsay...someone, some friend, some other Harvey the Invisible Rabbit... You are just so full of crap...!!! just a rumor monger...!!!!Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06093426896476666691noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-91826087192150533922010-12-20T08:45:22.105-08:002010-12-20T08:45:22.105-08:00Where's Lynette?
This is not like her -- not ...Where's Lynette?<br /><br />This is not like her -- not to post every hour!<br /><br /><br />Ann,<br /><br />You are right. It WAS the recalled board who decided to ruin Tri-W and start the construction early (no turning back was their plan). Mike can try to spin it any way he wants but the bottom line is the bottom line.<br /><br />What's really weird is that if the State Water Board had not loaned out the first installment of the UNSECURED loan then Stan, Richard, and Gordon couldn't have started the project at all.<br /><br />Yup, they were the ones who started the Tri-W project a month too early to cause the tremendous damage which of course includes the bankruptcy!<br /><br />P.S. A friend of mine over heard the contractors working on the Tri-W say they had never made so much money on a job. Another friend told me that they were to get a bonus to finish the job early.GetRealOsoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11936638912249439168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-51324595380730807542010-12-20T07:18:14.275-08:002010-12-20T07:18:14.275-08:00Chris sez:"No one voted to turn the site inot...Chris sez:"No one voted to turn the site inot a mud wallow."<br /><br />Uh, Stan, Gordo & Richard did when they started construction before the recall election. <br /><br />Chris, are you a Mike clone and just make stuff up? Yikes. <br /><br />and Chris sez (quoting from the Tribune):"As it is now, owners of single-family homes will pay nearly $200 a month for the next 30 to 40 years to finance the project."<br /><br />Uh, Chris, think you missed the "as it is now . . ." as in "as this editorial is being written. HOWEVER, those numbers MAY change IF construction bids come in under the guestimates, & etc. <br /><br />Aw, Chrissie, don't be another Mikee, stupidly making stuff up. One stupid Mikee per blog is more than enough.Churadogshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17701649330085709021noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-23036375327851717472010-12-19T18:08:43.550-08:002010-12-19T18:08:43.550-08:00Ron, Ron, Ron,
Since you specialize in history yo...Ron, Ron, Ron,<br /><br />Since you specialize in history you probably missed this from the Tribune Article on the Los Osos Rates hearing. <br /><br />"As it is now, owners of single-family homes will pay nearly $200 a month for the next 30 to 40 years to finance the project."<br /><br />Oops! seems your figures (and the hopes of the County) are out of date. We are now in line to pay much more than the any of the previous projects.<br /><br />Retired banker hubby reminded me that the cost thrown around by the County don't include the bankruptcy and depend on the forgiveness of fines for polluting our water.<br /><br />So, I am quite confident in saying your team failed...and failed miserably...to accomplish any of the goals the obstructionists dreamed of.<br /><br />Laughing at you, not with you.<br /><br />Read more: http://www.sanluisobispo.com/2010/12/15/1408595/protest-of-los-osos-sewer-project.html#ixzz18c38zm5NUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17207967371183972798noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-75412508962792883162010-12-19T17:42:44.442-08:002010-12-19T17:42:44.442-08:00Hey Ronnie.WHEN do we see YOUR piece on the virtuo...Hey Ronnie.WHEN do we see YOUR piece on the virtuous Julie Tacker... wonderful mother and wife....???????<br /><br />No guts...???? Just a wantabe hack who got fired from the Sun Bulletin...!!!!Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06093426896476666691noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-76081801562339905582010-12-19T17:22:19.556-08:002010-12-19T17:22:19.556-08:00An anonymous commenter titled, "Chris" -...An anonymous commenter titled, "Chris" -- another silly, made-up name, and part of another silly "behavior based marketing" "<a href="http://sewerwatch.blogspot.com/2007/05/she-is-los-osos-part-ii.html" rel="nofollow">strategy</a>" -- writes:<br /><br /><i>"Here's what I saw at Tri W: A monument to the undeniable failure of your Shicker-Tacker-Sesena-Senet-Fouche team.</i>"<br /><br />Really? Huh... how very "behavior based marketing" of you.<br /><br />Because, for about the millionth time, let me show you what the County of SLO <a href="http://sewerwatch.blogspot.com/2010/08/how-water-quality-control-board.html" rel="nofollow">saw</a> at the Tri-W disaster.<br /><br />Straight from the County's <i>Pro/Con Analysis</i>, available at this link:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Assets/PW/LOWWP/TAC/TAC+Final+Pro-Con+Component+Analysis+8-6-07.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Assets/PW/LOWWP/TAC/TAC+Final+Pro-Con+Component+Analysis+8-6-07.pdf</a><br /><br /><br />- "(Tri-W's) downtown location (near library, church, community center) and the high density residential area require that the most expensive treatment technology, site improvements and odor controls be employed."<br /><br />and;<br /><br />- "It (The Tri-W sewer plant) has high construction costs..." ($55 million. The next highest treatment facility option is estimated at $19 million.)<br /><br />and;<br /><br />- "Very high land value and mitigation requirements"<br /><br />and;<br /><br />- Tri-W energy requirements: "Highest"<br /><br />and;<br /><br />- "Small acreage and location in downtown center of towns (sic) require most expensive treatment"<br /><br />and;<br /><br />- "higher costs overall"<br /><br />and;<br /><br />- "Limited flexibility for future expansion, upgrades, or alternative energy"<br /><br />and;<br /><br />- "Source of community divisiveness"<br /><br />and;<br /><br />- "All sites are tributary to the Morro Bay National Estuary and pose a potential risk in the event of failure. Tri-W poses a higher risk..."<br /><br />and;<br /><br />- "NOTE: It was the unanimous opinion of the (National Water Research Institute) that an out of town site is better due to problematic issues with the downtown site."<br /><br />and;<br /><br />- "ESHA – sensitive dune habitat"<br /><br />Then there's the March 2009, "Los Osos Wastewater Project Community Advisory Survey," conducted by county officials, "Only (9-percent) of (Prohibition Zone) respondents chose the mid-town (Tri-W) location (as their preference for the treatment facility)."<br /><br />And, of course, finally, in a June 2009 letter to the California Coastal Commission, the SLO County "Project team," writes, "The Project team, given the clear social infeasibility issue associated with Mid Town (Tri-W project) and the infeasible status of the LOCSD disposal plan [bolding mine], believes that if either of those options are deemed by decision-makers to be the best solution for Los Osos, then serious consideration should be given by the Board (of Supervisors) to adopt a due diligence resolution and not pursue Project implementation."<br /><br />Still laughing, "Chris?"<br /><br />Wanna see me laugh?<br /><br /><i>"... if either of those options are deemed by decision-makers to be the best solution for Los Osos, then serious consideration should be given by the Board (of Supervisors) to adopt a due diligence resolution and not pursue Project implementation."</i>"<br /><br />AAAAAAhahahahahahahahah!Ronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14156410299483542733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-5815650950026821322010-12-19T14:49:55.210-08:002010-12-19T14:49:55.210-08:00Ron,
Here's what I saw at Tri W: A monument t...Ron,<br /><br />Here's what I saw at Tri W: A monument to the undeniable failure of your Shicker-Tacker-Sesena-Senet-Fouche team.<br /><br />It seems your team thinks cutting your nose off to spite your face, or in this case a whole community successfully fulfills their duties. <br /><br />No one voted to turn the site inot a mud wallow. Attempting to label as "success" the conversion of a project (that as Mike pointed out was financed, had all required permits and was under construction) into a multi-million dollar bankruptcy is shameful!<br /><br />At some point you must really give up your vitriol because hanging in there is just making you look like an even bigger loser.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17207967371183972798noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-29676081365092623182010-12-19T14:32:55.565-08:002010-12-19T14:32:55.565-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17207967371183972798noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-52252041541551620422010-12-19T11:27:22.600-08:002010-12-19T11:27:22.600-08:00...Pandora's doing very well without Your spot......Pandora's doing very well without Your spotlight... <br /><br />SAY, Maybe YOU should write about Juile-what-ever-her-name is and how she's saved Los Osos and Oceano... You do know she's a perfect mom and wife...Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06093426896476666691noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-21694489307646166832010-12-19T11:06:54.696-08:002010-12-19T11:06:54.696-08:00The anonymous commenter "Mike" writes:
...The anonymous commenter "Mike" writes:<br /><br /><i>"...say ronnie... We're sure thankful for YOU giving Pandora all the great press... </i>"<br /><br />and;<br /><br /> <i>"She been able to ride that wave of words to be effective in working toward more and better parks within ALL of SLO county</i>"<br /><br />Right. Perfect!<br /><br />Like I wrote before, we have a genuine Kumbaya moment here.<br /><br />So, that means that you should write to Supervisor Gibson <i>demanding</i> that he pops out an official Resolution at a BOS meeting this January, recognizing her for her 20 years on the Parks Commission.<br /><br />And then that would open up a public comment period on that Item, and then, just a hunch, we'd REALLY hear from the "silent majority." (OH, that'd be soooo sweeeet!)<br /><br />C'mon, "Mike," help me out!<br /><br />Write to Bruce, like I recently did at this link:<br /><br /><a href="http://sewerwatch.blogspot.com/2010/12/celebrate-pandora-part-ii.html" rel="nofollow">http://sewerwatch.blogspot.com/2010/12/celebrate-pandora-part-ii.html</a><br /><br />... and <i>demand</i> that he "honor" Pandora.<br /><br />Doncha wanna see ol' P. celebrated? Hey, 20 years.<br /><br />"Chris?" 'toons? C'mon! We're all on the same boat on this, right?<br /><br />"Celebrate Pandora!"<br /><br />Kumbaya, my Lord, Kumbaya...Ronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14156410299483542733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13758431.post-68297713361491078542010-12-19T10:40:11.581-08:002010-12-19T10:40:11.581-08:00...say ronnie... We're sure thankful for YOU g......say ronnie... We're sure thankful for YOU giving Pandora all the great press... She been able to ride that wave of words to be effective in working toward more and better parks within ALL of SLO county... Guess negative bs from YOU is a good thing...!!!!<br /><br />So far, we can't come up with a single person YOU have been able to run out of town... Keep up the good work...!!!!Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06093426896476666691noreply@blogger.com