Calhouns Can(n)ons

Sunday, February 17, 2008

And Rabenaldt Replies . . .

In my Feb 15 posting, "Left Hand, Please Meet The Right Hand," I wrote about the problem the Tribune had getting their act together to figure out WHICH "public fools" they wanted to praise or faintly damn; specifically Pismo Beach's City Councilmember, Bill Rabenalt.

Well, Bill replied to Bill (Morem's) column over at http://www.uncoveredslo.com/

Makes for interesting reading. Especially for folks who keep wondering what the heck the Tribune is up to and why. Well, par for the course, I suppose.

33 comments:

Gadfly said...: This comment has been removed by the author.; 10:30 AM, February 17, 2008
Gadfly said...: Ann,

See your making excuses and apologizing for the bad behavior of Mr. Rabenaldt......all the while nursing your dislike of the opinions of the Tribune and Mr. Morem.

Gadfly; 10:30 AM, February 17, 2008
Watershed Mark said...: Gadfly,
Have you seen an opthalmologist lately or do you just read the Tribune on a regular basis?

When the "paper of record" does not report "facts" or under reports the facts surrounding events they do report, it is the duty of a patriot to "call them on it".

Got blog?/What's in your "blog"?; 3:31 PM, February 17, 2008
Gadfly said...: Mark,

Your 'facts' are just your opinion of the application of laws which you misinterpet regarding the 'requirement' to accept your uproven and bogus technology (the reclamator).

Go ahead a sue everybody you have threatened. You will lose.

Do not try to bull$hit me again.

Gadfly; 6:06 PM, February 17, 2008
Watershed Mark said...: Gadfly-n. a fly that bites cattle

I suppose you believe hurling unsubstantiated comments as an anonymous "poster child" is a good way to test your arguments, without consequences as there is no "accountability" on your part. So I will make the best of your post in an effort to further promulgate, in a very concise manner. (Thank you Ann for the space, I'll keep it short)

Check out the Engineering Package and C26 located on www.NOwastewater.com If you are a lawyer and or an engineer both should be of interest to your study of the LOSTDEP RECLAMATOR Solution. If you are not a lawyer or an engineer your comments are just your unqualified, unproven and bogus opinions. Care to test them in court? See what I mean?

Fact(s)-n. reality, evidence, a thing known to have happened or to be true

I can take any kind of language no problem, but I would appreciate your not using profanity, even if you spell it with a dollar sign.; 10:25 PM, February 17, 2008
Watershed Mark said...: At least the Tribune can keep us up to date on the office hours of the Assemblyman.
A public opportunity to ask "A representative from the office of Assemblyman Sam Blakeslee whether the Federal Law was considered when AB 2701 was "crafted" and about the "FACTS". attached.

Any comments at all about http://www.nowastewater.com/documents/fraudulent_use_218.pdf ?

It would be great if we could see the Assemblyman's or his "representative's" response in a reply email!

Public service from public servants, the sooner the better.

A representative from

the office of Assemblyman Sam Blakeslee, R-San Luis Obispo, will hold office hours from 10 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Friday at the Cambria Community Services District office, 1316 Tamson Drive, Suite 204.

The office hours are part of an effort to make state government more accessible, according to Blakeslee’s office.

Staff will be available to assist constituents in working with state agencies and discussing positions on issues. They will also have information on the state budget, legislative process, ways to get more involved in state

government and ongoing work of the 33rd Assembly District office.

No appointment is necessary.

—Tribune staff report; 5:31 AM, February 18, 2008
Churadogs said...: Gadfly sez:"all the while nursing your dislike of the opinions of the Tribune and Mr. Morem.

Gadfly"

"dislike" Mr. Morem? Woa, you really don't know what you're talking about. Nor did you bother to read what I had written. The point of the entry was to note that Morem and the Tribune needed to get on the same page. Please go back and read the title . . . left hand, right hand. Get it?; 7:26 AM, February 18, 2008
Gadfly said...: Mark,

Don't try to bull$hit me.

You have already shown everyone by your actions and threats to be just a snakeoil salesman. Just slither away.

Gadfly; 8:26 AM, February 18, 2008
Gadfly said...: Ann,

You would not know what the 'process' is if it bite you on your fanny.

For years you have wanted to fight the water board over the PZ...you got your wish. You will lose, at MY EXPENSE dearie.

In fact, by the time the sewer is built.....as you go through yet another 'process'..... you and the other toadies will have to hop away as you will not be able to afford living in Los Osos anymore.

I and the rest of the folks who decide to remain and cleanup your mess will wave bye-bye as you leave.

Gadfly; 8:32 AM, February 18, 2008
Unknown said...: Gadfly, there are a great many of us who feel exactly the same as you do! There never will be a Process clean enough for Ann unless it's her uncompromised vision of the perfect Process! She lives in a dream world blissfully ignorant of the corruption she has cheered on lo these past few years. Ann has in no way been part of any solution, merely another smokescreen in hyping petty problems.; 10:53 AM, February 18, 2008
Watershed Mark said...: Gadfly: You lack any real credibilty. I know Mike is a "big project" guy(or gal) so what government agency do you work for?

A leaky 40+ mile energy/carbon/water/money/people eating snake vs. a clean sustainable cutting edge water harvesting federally compliant technology...Hire the service you want, it's a free country. Don't worry be happy:-)

Where have you been I noticed that you just began posting in February 08. Another credility factor to add to your closet...

I guess you believe that profanity makes your point better. You are correct..Why so "angry"??; 11:11 AM, February 18, 2008
Watershed Mark said...: Gadfly said...
Mark,

Don't try to (explicative deleted) me.

WSM says- No problem, your hostility and anger provide me with the opportunity to promulgate while illuminating your ignorance, why would I want to stop that?
How about you step on over to my blog. Just click on my handle. This is Ann's Land. If you want to argue with me I have the space and time for you there. However, I will have "zero" tolerance for profanity.
Any postings with profanity will be "clipped". I have a ten year old son who is following the LOSTDEP RECLAMATOR Solution with great interest. I want to be proud to have whatever I can control something which will serve in all future RECLAMATOR Solutions. So I welcome criticism leave your profanity in the closet, please.

Seriously where have you been?
Is it that certain facts are beginning to sink in that drove you from the safety of your keyhole blog voyeurism into the closet of anonymity?

If you are so proud of your behavior show yourself in public like me. Let us all know who you are. You'll get the respect you think you deserve from me.
I suggest a Thesaurus in order to find word choices that may fully illuminate that which you are attempting to convey with your profanity.

You'll feel better once your "out" of the closet...But that's just my opinion.; 11:35 AM, February 18, 2008
Gadfly said...: Mark,

Cut the bull$hit. Like in Lake Havasu, you will be the butt of many jokes as you slither out of Los Osos.

As for angry, hell hath no fury like a property owner screwed out of TENS of THOUSANDS of dollars by the compleley a$$inine and insane decisions of Julie T, Lisa S, Chuck C, Steve S, John F; as supported by the toadies Linde O, Keith S, Ann C, Dugan, A Pearleman, Al B, J Biggs, Annajane H, D Blesky, Bo T, Lacey T, R Margetson, Gwene T, George T, B Difta, Peggy P, Saunna S, Joey R, Gail M, Judy V, and you.

I, and many others, can hardly wait until the TW lawsuit against the CSD board goes to trial; and results in the Judge slapping each of these fools with $400,000 judgements apiece to pay misappropriated CSD funds (paid by property owners)back into the CSD.

With the TW win, all hell going to break loose on that board!....and I will have absolutely no sympathy for the finacial disaster they have brought upon themselves by the stupidity of their actions. Stupidity of such sheer magnitude will not be rewarded.

As for the board and their toadies, they will scatter and leave town once a project is built. I will remain, as will other famiiies, to clean up and pay atleast $400 per month for YEARS to pay for the mess they have caused.

Gadfly; 11:51 AM, February 18, 2008
Unknown said...: You are not alone Gadfly!!!

Mark and the Wrecklamator is already a joke around Los Osos.

The CalTrans Four probably have their transfer requests submitted. Sweet Julie has hook in Edwards in hope his bankruptcy will protect her. We all know they are looking for any way out of facing a judge for paying their personal attornies with District Funds.

Lot's of 'splain' to do! and there still will be a real sewer in Los Osos!!!; 12:09 PM, February 18, 2008
Watershed Mark said...: Fear and loathing in LO/BP...

I guess you really haven't processed the "facts", yet or maybe you have;-)

Come out, come who ever you are..:-)

W
Didn't you read that we will be returning to LHC?; 12:28 PM, February 18, 2008
Gadfly said...: Mark,

Cut the bull$hit!

Silly of you to presume that I have not 'processed the facts'. Meanwhile, I'll let you keep on wasting your time playing 'who's the biogger' guessing game.

Tell you what; once your fanny is driven out of town (along with your bogus reclamator), I'll tell you who I am. Seems fair to me! In the meanwhile, you have nothing to offer me, Los Osos, or the County.

Gadfly; 12:49 PM, February 18, 2008
Watershed Mark said...: If there was anything wrong with the Technology or the Law you would have heard it by now...Hmmm.

Come out, come out who ever you are!; 1:07 PM, February 18, 2008
Gadfly said...: Mark,

What's wrong...where are your pithy quotes and the tomes you have posted in the past in order to (you think) overwhelm the reader while feeding your puesdo-savior mentality?

Gadfly; 1:13 PM, February 18, 2008
Watershed Mark said...: Seems fair to me! Spoken like someone who is in the closet..Hmmm.

You still haven't addressed what caused you to jopin the discussion, so late in the game...what's your motivation?

What happens to you when Los Osos becomes ground zero for the RECLAMATOR?

Keep laying down that type...I'm not concerned in the least as to who you are. You words betray your heart and soul. Your mind is still up for grabs.; 1:55 PM, February 18, 2008
Watershed Mark said...: Any fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction.
Albert Einstein

Stay off the P~I~P~E~...How's that?; 2:05 PM, February 18, 2008
Gadfly said...: Mark,

Oh my, your such a (t)WIT! My hat is off to you, Mark.

Why not 'move in the opposite direction' (ie out of town) and leave Los Osos free from your mercenary ways.

Why not show to the County and Los Osos the thousands of data points taken over years of reclamator operation needed to prove that your technology works? Really, that is what COMPETENT ENGINEERS do to support the type of claims you are making about the performance of your system. Or, as I and many others believe, your just too lazy to deal with that nasty scientific method.

Easy to make a believer out of me, Mark....just provide valid data. Why do you resist?...OH!, could it be that you are full of bull$hit?

Gadfly; 2:42 PM, February 18, 2008
Watershed Mark said...: This comment has been removed by the author.; 2:48 PM, February 18, 2008
Watershed Mark said...: When you show me the law that supports your request, I'll be happy to comply with your wishes.

Where is the "valid data" from the county's consulting engineer study? Hmmm.

But then it is obvious you cannot read an engineering report...

Talk about the 60's "I'm a believer"???; 2:55 PM, February 18, 2008
Gadfly said...: Mark,

To quote K Swanson, 'unbelievable'!

Are you so naive that you really think that you do not have to prove that your reclamator works?

The systems to be reviewed by the County are shown to be reliable and effective by valid data collected through ACTUAL USE AND TESTING OVER MANY YEARS. If you need their data, go ask em!

Do not try to bull$shit me again.

Gadfly; 3:29 PM, February 18, 2008
Watershed Mark said...: There is no requirement for data that has not been met.

The county and the waterboard do not want to lose the project, the water or the money associated with it... Go ask em.

Do you eat with that mouth??; 4:11 PM, February 18, 2008
Watershed Mark said...: It works. Go ask em.; 4:12 PM, February 18, 2008
Gadfly said...: Planet Earth to Mark,

I have asked if it (the reclaimator)works....It doesn't. Prove me wrong; but no doubt you will try to bully me by threatening to sue me for defamation or whatever nonsense you emote.

Gadfly; 4:46 PM, February 18, 2008
Watershed Mark said...: Who at the WaterBoard did you ask?
Did you get ink?

The proof is in plain sight, but you won't, can't or don't understand it...

Don't feel bad that you can't or don't understand, it's very esoteric stuff.

Too bad you have to use such nasty language and ultimatums to express yourself...But it's a free country.

My opinon is that you may do better if you displayed a little more decorum and patience.

But you must be cramped up from looking through the keyhole from your closet.

Thanks for sharing.; 7:24 PM, February 18, 2008
Watershed Mark said...: Connecting the dots...

As for angry, hell hath no fury like a property owner screwed out of TENS of THOUSANDS of dollars by the compleley a$$inine and insane decisions of "____________"...

I will remain, as will other famiiies, to clean up and pay at least $400 per month for YEARS to pay for the mess they have caused.

Gadfly said...
Mark,

Don't try to (explicative deleted) me.

Gadfly-n. a fly that bites cattle

Now I understand all the references to cattle excrement...

The LOSTDEP RECLAMATOR Solution is $15,000.00 to initiate service and 45.75 a month tied to the CPI.

Why would anyone want to pay more?
Oh and you get acess to 100% consumptive use of your valuable "harvest water". Think 14th. Amendment to the Constitution here.

Or you can go with the County. It's a great country we are living in. (even in the closet); 7:57 PM, February 18, 2008
Churadogs said...: Mark sez:"You still haven't addressed what caused you to jopin the discussion, so late in the game...what's your motivation?"

Who's to say "Gadfly" is "new" to this blog? Suppose "Gadfly" is, for example, "4Crapkiller" using a different name? some of Gadfly's language and style of writing (and issues and rages) sure reads eerily familair to good old Crap's issues and rages. and style -- and same unwillingness to come out from under the cloak of anonyminity. Same Old, New Name?; 7:39 AM, February 19, 2008
Gadfly said...: This comment has been removed by the author.; 8:45 AM, February 19, 2008
Gadfly said...: Mark,

Cut the Bull$shit!

'Very esoteric stuff'? HA!
Your so-called engineering report LACKS REPRESENTATIVE DATA POINTS TAKEN OVER TIME! Picking only the single piece of testing results that you like as it supports your fraud is a professional faux pas, dearie!

I see you had to look up 'GADFLY' in the dictionary. Good for you! Why do you not tell use what the OTHER definition of GADFLY is (buzzzzzz).

I am a very patient person, except for flakes like you.

Gadfly; 8:47 AM, February 19, 2008
Watershed Mark said...: Dearie?

I thought you were done talking with me...

Ann is correct regarding your reading comprehension.; 6:56 PM, February 19, 2008

Pages

Sunday, February 17, 2008

33 comments: