Pages

Friday, March 28, 2008

Calhoun’s Can(n)ons, The Bay News, Tolosa Press, SLO, Ca., for March 27, 2008

Mother Calhoun Explains It All To You Some More, Again, Redux

The very purpose of existence is to reconcile the glowing opinion we hold of ourselves with the appalling things that other people think about us.
Quentin Crisp


Clearly, you didn’t listen to Mother Calhoun years ago when she explained it all to you and now we have Politicians Behaving Badly Again, so take your hands out of your pockets, sit down and listen up.

1. If you’re the Commander in Chief and you lie a country into war, and your soldiers are dying daily in the streets of Baghdad, do not, under any circumstances, put on a funny hat and attend a Gridiron Dinner and sing off-key little musical ditties that make fun of your ginned up WMD lies, a get-out-of-jail card for your crony, Scooter Libby, and other assortments of your appalling bungles. Such a performance surely goes beyond the matter of mere Bad Taste and enters into the realm of Sociopathy.

2. If you are a Senator, you need to know that tap dancing is not appropriate behavior while in airport bathroom stalls. If you want to tap, take dance lessons. If you want sex, get a motel room. Do not try to combine the two activities in a public toilet. And when caught, don’t bother to claim you’re not “gay.” It’s not relevant. Nobody cares. They just don’t want their Broadway musicals combined with “wide stance” lower abdominal digestive problems.

3. When it’s time for you to do your perp walk to the microphones, paper bag on your moronic head to publicly atone for your Bad Behavior, leave your wife at home. Mother Calhoun is sick of seeing that blank, upside-the-head stare from The Humiliated, Betrayed Little Woman. If you were man enough to blow $4,500 on hookers, you’re man enough to stand up before your constituents alone. Dragging along The Wife isn’t a demonstration of Family Loyalty or Family Values. It’s simply another manifestation of your enormous ego, in all its malign glory, humiliating your wife (again) by using her as a convenient prop for your pathetic public mea culpa.

4. If the public is tired of all this bad behavior, then Mother Calhoun suggests a New Law: Every person holding elected office shall be required to actively participate in a weekly 12-Step Program of some kind throughout their tenure. There is nothing better for keeping the ego in check than a 12-Step Program. And that’s the problem here: Ego.

Eliot Spitzer, for example didn’t get into a mess because his testosterone level was too high. He got into trouble because his false, unchecked ego gave him a mistaken sense of entitlement. He thought he was “entitled” to $1,000-an-hour hookers, and was “entitled” to be above the law, and when perp-walked out on stage, was “entitled” to use his wife as a humiliated prop to shield his ego from its richly deserved comeuppance. In short, he was caught “Walking While Stupid” because he didn’t understand that as an Office Holder, he wasn’t “entitled” to hookers and VIP Kitty-Kat Klubs, or the Best Seats In The House. Instead, he was “entitled” to thankless hard work, endless headaches and snotty letters-to-the-editor from his constituents telling him to “Get Over Yourself.” A good 12-step program would have daily reminded him of that hard fact.

Mother Calhoun can only hope that so many chickens flying home to roost is a signal that the time for Karmic cleansing is at hand – things ending badly because they were started badly – and before renewal, the old must be swept away.

It is always odd that we never seem to understand that all actions do have some kind of consequence no matter how much we wish to deny that fact. While sexual hypocrisy is a stock item in the human comedy, an army foolishly wasted and bleeding in foreign lands, a nation driven into financial meltdown by incompetence, lies and dangerously reckless, Kool-Aid-drinking ideologues, a public now paying a high price for its apathy and inattention -- none of this is comedy, no matter how many funny hats a Commander in Chief puts on or how many satirical ditties he may sing.

And most important of all, The Piper is never amused. Of all the players, he alone is “entitled,” and he will be paid.

19 comments:

Shark Inlet said...

Ann,

You forgot to mention Hillary's unwillingness to throw in the towel even though the Dem chance of taking the presidency is being hurt every day that she continues her attempt to be her party's nominee.

She seems to have adopted a scorched earth strategy and this is making me wonder whether the Republicans were right some 10 years ago when they said that all the Clintons were about was self-aggrandizement and power.

Personally, I am appalled at the behavior of Bill in particular. He's been the willing participant in many sleazy attempts to manipulate voters during this campaign (for example, saying that both Hillary and John McClain love their country but leaving out the Democratic front runner). I want to also point out that most all of the arguments they've recently been using (Hillary has experience but Barack doesn't, etc.) were rejected by both Clintons in 1992 when Bill ran as a governor with zero foreign policy experience.

But enough rambling from me ...

Sewertoons AKA Lynette Tornatzky said...

Ann said:
"Mother Calhoun is sick of seeing that blank, upside-the-head stare from The Humiliated, Betrayed Little Woman"

Me too, but I'm curious as to why the "little woman" doesn't have the sense/judgement to stay home?" But then maybe that's why she married a guy with a big ego and all that goes with it. Unless of course staying with him carries some other agenda.

Watershed Mark said...

All public servants elected, unelected, appointent need to heed the words of MC.

Don't forget Obama "going Wright".

Watershed Mark said...

Better Citizenship equals better Government, get over it...


Whether you are a Democrat, Republican or Independent.... these are the facts .....

Taxes under Clinton 1999 Taxes under Bush 2008

Single making 30K - tax $8,400 Single making 30K - tax $4,500

Single making 50K - tax $14,000 Single making 50K - tax $12,500

Single making 75K - tax $23,250 Single making 75K - tax $18,750

Married making 60K - tax $16,800 Married making 60K- tax $9,000

Married making 75K - tax $21,000 Married making 75K - tax $18,750

Married making 125K - tax $38,750 Married making 125K - tax $31,250


If you want to know just how effective the mainstream media is, it is amazing how many people that fall into the categories above think Bush is screwing them and Bill Clinton was the greatest President ever. If ANY democrat is elected, ALL of them say they will repeal the Bush tax cuts and a good portion of the people that fall into the categories above can't wait for it to happen. This is like the movie The Sting with Paul Newman; you scam somebody out of some money and they don't even know what happened.



Your Social Security

Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn't know this. It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it. Be sure and show it to your kids. They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter whether you ar e Demo crat of Republican. Facts are Facts!!!


Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. He promised:

1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary,

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program,

3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year,

4.) That the money the participants put into the independent "Trust Fund" rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and,

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the mo ney we paid to the Federal government to "put away" -- you may be interested in the following:

-------------------------------------------------------------

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent "Trust Fund" and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically-controlled House and Senate.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?

A: The Democratic Party.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?

A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the "tie-breaking" deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the U S.

------------------------------------------------- ------ ------------

Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?

AND MY FAVORITE:

A: That's right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!

If enough people read this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not as some are awfully sure of what isn't so.

Actions speak louder than bumper stickers.
AND CONGRESS GIVES THEMSELVES 100% RETIREMENT FOR ONLY SERVING ONE TERM!!!


A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have. - Thomas Jefferson

*PG-13 said...

Not wanting at all to distract from Ann's exceptionally well written commentary on the karmic consequences of every action ..... I gotta say this:

All interesting numbers ShedHead. Quantitative numbers from ShedHead are - by their very uniquity - noteworthy. And, in this case interesting. So interesting as to make me wonder whether they are true and where they came from. I mean, on one level I don't necessarily disagree with them. Nobody likes taxes. Especially this time of year. But on another level I think them bogus. Sure would have been nice if you had attributed your source. I recall I taught you how to do that not too long ago. If you're going to cut & paste such content and post it as "FACT" - as you are so wont to do - then surely it is just as easy to cut & paste the source too. No?

This is what I find out about that. It appears that this content noted as factual data was published on a number of webpages. And has since been propageted on oodles more. For example, this "Thoughts of a Conservative Christian" web article. So we can't be certain exactly where Mark picked up his facts. Curiously, the Conservative Christian article actually cites another website www.taxfoundation.org as the source of the published content. Then supplies a recursive bogus link to the citation. If one actually goes to the taxfoundation.org website and searches for this content you find this:

> Recently an incorrect comparison of income taxes under
> Presidents Clinton and Bush has been making the rounds of
> the internet, showing up in forwarded e-mails and on numerous
> blogs and message boards. ...
> This message shows that income taxes under George Bush are lower
> than income taxes under Bill Clinton, and it relies on Tax Foundation
> data to make this comparison. The author used a Tax Foundation chart
> showing the federal individual income tax rates and brackets from 1913
> to the present to calculate the income taxes paid by hypothetical
> married and single taxpayers at various income levels under 1999
> tax law and 2008 tax law.
>
> While the basic message of the comparison is correct (federal income
> taxes have indeed fallen under George Bush for groups at all points
> on the income spectrum), the chart created by the author of this
> comparison contains some mathematical errors. Furthermore, the
> comparisons are exaggerated by the fact that annual inflation
> adjustments in the tax code would have lowered tax bills in 2008
> relative to 1999 under a constant nominal income amount.
>
> The table below presents the correct amount of tax paid by
> each of the hypothetical taxpayers in the comparison.
> Note that this comparison does not take into account the
> Alternative Minimum Tax, and the taxpayers in these examples
> take the standard deduction and do not have children.


The numbers presented are not nearly as dramatic as Mark's numbers. Indeed, given the costs to achieve these minor deminishment in taxes one could easily wonder if they were worth it. Especially when counter-balanced by the humongous increase in national debt and the current state of the economy. Note: Facts without basis are not Facts! And facts published without attribution are often - indeed, on the internet, they are very often - not facts.

I found this an interesting adjunct to this thought. Snopes, being Snopes, did an interesting study on the veracity of some internet facts. Remember the "Make the Pie Higher" poem composed of actual Bush quotes? Snopes did a study to determine whether the attributions were true. And ........ yes! They are all true. And interesting read here

Churadogs said...

Inlet sez: regarding Hillary: "She seems to have adopted a scorched earth strategy and this is making me wonder whether the Republicans were right some 10 years ago when they said that all the Clintons were about was self-aggrandizement and power."

Hillary and George Bush strike me as similar characters: both seem totally uncomfortable in their skins. With George, it's because he's a dry drunk, which makes him incredibly dangerous. Hillary's discomfort likely comes from some other place. I've seen what Bush has done. Scary. Don't want a repeat of that. One thing that strikes me so forcefully about Obana is his preternatural core-center calm. Very unusual in a Pol.

PG 13 did some snooping. Good job. The posting you reference is a good illustration of what's finally starting to take place in this country: A discussion as to the Values of the Commons. We're looking at the end game of the so-called Reagan Revolution. The end-result is Grover Norquist, and the public face/public policy of Norquistianism is Bush & Co's Golden Crony Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules so he who has the gold can get more gold. The problem with that philosophy comes from Voltaire: "History is filled with the sound of silken slippers going downstairs and wooden shoes coming up."

In a captialistic Democracy, the more people buying into a stake in the Commons, the stronger the Democracy, the more prosperous the country since it is the Value and Power of the Commons to create public policy that gets more and more people engaged as productive members contributing to the Commons, and lessens the number becoming a drain on that Commons. When that proportion of "contributors" and 'drainers" gets out of whack, which is what's happened over the past 7 years, things can get very dangerous for a Democracy.

Watershed Mark said...

Fortunately "we" live in a Constitutional Republic which provides for common defense, promotes the general welfare, life, liberty and the "pursuit" of happiness. On the nombers, unfortunately figures can lie and liars can figure. When we have better citizenship we shall have better government at every level.

It is both that simple and that difficult, "when in the course of human events"...
Power to the People "only" if they are smart enough to know it...

The original framers of the United States Constitution were notably cognizant of what they perceived as a danger of majority rule in oppressing freedom and liberty of the individual. The framers carefully created the institutions within the Constitution and the United States Bill of Rights. They kept what they believed were the best elements of majority rule. But they were mitigated by a constitution with protections for individual liberty, a separation of powers, and a layered federal structure. Inalienable rights refers to a set of human rights that are not awarded by human power, and cannot be surrendered.[52] The Constitution of the United States was written to protect the inalienable rights of citizens from potential excesses of government, even if taken by majority rule. Inalienable rights are not granted by government, but by nature.[53]

Republicanism and Liberalism have complex relationships to democracy and republic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy

Shark Inlet said...

Mark,

Let's focus only on your tax numbers and even if they are 100% accurate, we really need to ask one additional question ... what is the size of the budget (and therefor the deficit) under Bush and under Clinton? With that in mind, it seems really clear that Bush is quite willing to spend but unwilling to pay the bills. Should I really respect the president with the highest rate (in real dollars) of increasing debt per person?

Watershed Mark said...

Shark:

Making and staying on budget is a good thing.
I wish "everyone" understood that.

The thing is Presidents don't write budgets they approve them. Remember Congress limited the term a President could serve but not their own.

I am always amazed at the amount of finger pointing that is directed to the symptom, while little is ever made of the root cause.

obama-nation said...

Watermark & Shark,

A few more interesting stats.....

Average price per gallon of gas in 2000 before GWB took office.....$1.49/gallon
Average price per gallon of gas now?...........................pushing $4.00/gallon.
A 270% increase.

What did GWB do before he was elected President? Oh, that's right, he was in the OIL BUSINESS!!! I would say, Waterboy, that any savings you’ve acquired from the bogus minimal tax cuts that you site have gone right back into the fuel pump and our tanking economy. The money you’ve saved from your tax cuts has gone into the pockets of the lobbyist(oil companies and defense contractors) that helped President Bush get elected. Very nice. Why would Mister President want the federal government to have your money when you can give it to the Big Oil companies and Haliburten and defense contractors who helped GWB get elected. Big surprise that our buddy George would take us to war, based on a lie, so we could make gazillions of dollars for these corporations who would profit from such a war. How many dead Americans and counting and for what? And, this is the guy you support? Are you insane? Since GWB, our Nation is facing the worst recession/depression since the 1920's. The real estate market is in the tank. The economy is in the tank. Or, do you live in a cave? What can one say and what would one expect from a President who is supported by and beholden to the Big-Oil and Defense Contractor lobbies?
"Mission accomplished."

More stats?........

US National Debt when Clinton left office in 2000................5.7 Trillion
US National Debt now................................................9.5 Trillion
almost and closing in on double........

US National Debt as a percentage of GDP when Clinton entered office in 1992.........68%
(remember how great the economy was when Bush I left office?)
US National Debt as a percentage of GDP when Clinton left office in 2000...............58%
US National Debt as a percentage of GDP after 8 years of GWB.................pushing 70%....

It only took George Junior 8 years to obliterate the economic gains which were made during the Clinton administration. GWB taking us into a war based on lies so he could make all his buddies rich was a nice start though......

Regarding Ann’s commentary on Eliot Spitzer, Bill Maher and his writers(never forget the writers) had some nice zingers in his monolog last night.
Bill stated; “The economy is so bad that Eliot Spitzer is having sex with his wife again.”

Regarding Barak Obama’s relationship with the controversial Rev. Jeremiah Wright,
Hillary Clinton was quoted as saying; “If my Minister had made such comments, I would of left the Church.” Maher’s response;
“So, if Hillary had caught her Minister getting a blow-job by Monica Lewinski, I guess she would of stayed.”......very funny....

One very disturbing thing that was discussed regarding the Spitzer investigation is that the federal investigation of Spitzer was enabled by laws that were passed in the Patriot Act. Something called Suspicious Activity Reports where banks have to report suspicious account activities to the federal Government. Problem: Wasn’t the Patriot Act passed to give our Government special and unprecedented access to private records in order to combat and investigate terrorism? Question: Why is the Federal Government and a Republican Administration using the laws provided by the Patriot Act to investigate the private lives of Democratic Governors? Does Eliot Spitzer look like a terrorist to you? He might be a whoremonger but he’s not a terrorist which tells me that the Federal Government under the GWB Administration told another lie, crossed another line, and violated the Public’s Trust. Homeland Security and the politics of fear that go with it are a total joke. I wonder what George Orwell would have to say About Homeland Security? I only know George Orwell thru his words but I’m guessing Orwell would say that the Patriot Act and Homeland Security are a prophetic crock of shit. I think Orwell would say; “I’d rather be Free than Secure.”

Regarding Barak Obama and Jeremiah Wright...........
Jeremiah Wright isn’t running for President of the United States.
Barak Obama is.
Those who oppose Barak Obama can’t find anything wrong with anything Senator Obama has done or said so they have to reach deep and attack the people he has associated himself with over time. To me, this just reeks of very sad and hopeless desperation on the part of those who oppose Senator Obama. Any American with a higher IQ than our incumbent president will see this, for the very sad and pathetic “strategery” it is.......

obama-nation said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
obama-nation said...

I forgot. Here's a link to the GWB economic doctrine......

http://www.deficitsdomatter.org/

Shark Inlet said...

Mark,

If you're rather quick to point out that Bush doesn't deserve blame for the budgets he signed (because, after all, congress approved those budgets) shouldn't similar credit for the tax cuts go to congress?

There is finely choreographed dance between the office of president and both houses in congress and until two years ago, congress (well, at least the majority) and the president had the same goals and they worked together to get their agreed-to-in-advance goals accomplished.

I would suggest that W's whitehouse has had a primary goal of making life easier for large corporations. They've used the "rising tide floats all boats" excuse and I am getting pretty tired of it.

Would Hillary be much different? Probably a bit, but I think that she still is focused far more on power and winning than on doing the right thing, even if it is tough.

Churadogs said...

Obama nation sez:"Wasn’t the Patriot Act passed to give our Government special and unprecedented access to private records in order to combat and investigate terrorism? Question: Why is the Federal Government and a Republican Administration using the laws provided by the Patriot Act to investigate the private lives of Democratic Governors? Does Eliot Spitzer look like a terrorist to you?

I memory serves, prior to 9/11, I think banks were supposed to report "suspicious" transactions aover $3,000 as part of the Drug Laundering War. So, I'm pretty sure banks have been snooping and reporting for a long time. The question here is this: IF Spitzer had been a Republican or hadn't made so many powerful eneimies on Wall Street, would the Feds and the DA have simply "declined to prosecute?" which is well within their discretion? True, part of the Spitzer's problem isn't really "sex," but the question of where the money came from and other laws, i.e. Mann Act. Althought everyone knows that broken laws are often ignored, depending.

and also sez:"Why would Mister President want the federal government to have your money when you can give it to the Big Oil companies and Haliburten and defense contractors who helped GWB get elected. Big surprise that our buddy George would take us to war, based on a lie, so we could make gazillions of dollars for these corporations who would profit from such a war."

The PNAC laid out the plan years before GWB got elected. Naomi Klein, first in her Harpers' magazne article years ago, "Baghdad, Year Zero," and now in her new book, "Shock Economics," spells out exactly what this was and is all about. The American people now have to make a decision: is PNAC/ Shock Economics/Cproporate America the way they wish to continue going, or not.

Watershed Mark said...

Shark: My point is it isn't only one party that is responsible for the mess we are in. Even citizens have failed to perform their duty adequately.

Shark Inlet said...

Mark,

As one who tends to vote Republican more often than not I would like you to listen carefully ... when W and his boys are in the White House and folks who vote along with his wishes are in control of both the House and Senate (think 2000-2006) and when spending increases horribly during that very same time period when taxes are lowered and lowered far more for the richest folks than for the "regular joes" out there ... don't you think we can blame the Republicans for at least much of the problem?

I won't tell you that Republicans are always wrong because I tend to be a Republican at heart. I just think (like John Dean and many others) that the Republican party of late has catered to the interests of big business and little else.

Churadogs said...

Inlet sez:"I won't tell you that Republicans are always wrong because I tend to be a Republican at heart. I just think (like John Dean and many others) that the Republican party of late has catered to the interests of big business and little else."

The republican party was hijacked by Newt Gingrich and the Foggy Bottom Boys, then further held hostage by both the PNAC boys and the Christian Right (pace Mr. Reed)not to mention the concerted, coordinated effort via the talk radio/Fox Noise, etc with the powerful push of Richard Viguiere (sp?) & etc. Add in Kool-Aid drinking Dems who were/are owned lock stock and barrel by Corporate America, and it's no wonder Barry Goldwater has been spinning in his grave for years. No checks and no balances with an electorate dumbed down and asleep at the switch, unable to connect the dots until the ship of state has now foundered on the shoals.

Now it remains to be seen if enough citizens are informed enough now or care enough now to help right that ship -- both dems and repubs together.

Watershed Mark said...

I would hope that the President would veto this bill. I do not believe it to be veto proof, even though everyone still in running for president votedfor it.

Question: WHERE DOES THE MONEY COME FROM???

Subject: More than the cost of the Iraqi war.

Social Security Change For 2008

The United States Senate voted to extend Social Security Benefits to Illegal Aliens beginning in 2008.
The following are the senators who voted to give illegal aliens Social Security benefits.
They are grouped by home state. If a state is not listed, there was no voting representative.

Alaska : Stevens (R)
Arizona : McCain (R)
Arkansas : Lincoln (D) Pryor (D)
California : Boxer (D) Feinstein (D)
Colorado : Salazar (D)
Connecticut : Dodd (D) Lieberman (D)
Delaware : Biden (D) Carper (D)
Florida : Martinez (R)
Hawaii : Akaka (D) Inouye (D)
Illinois : Durbin (D) Obama (D)
Indiana : Bayh (D) Lugar (R)
Iowa : Harkin (D)
Kansas : Brownback (R)
Louisiana : Landrieu (D)
Maryland : Mikulski (D) Sarbanes (D)
Massachusetts : Kennedy (D) Kerry (D)
Montana : Baucus (D)
Nebraska : Hagel (R)
Nevada : Reid (D)
New Jersey : Lautenberg (D) Menendez (D)
New Mexico : Bingaman (D)
New York : Clinton (D) Schumer (D)
North Dakota : Dorgan (D)
Ohio : DeWine (R) Voinovich(R)
Oregon : Wyden (D)
Pennsylvania : Specter (R)
Rhode Island : Chafee (R) Reed (D)
South Carolina : Graham (R)
South Dakota : Johnson (D)
Vermont : Jeffords (I) Leahy (D)
Washington : Cantwell (D) Murray (D)
West Virginia : Rockefeller (D), by Not Voting
Wisconsin : Feingold (D) Kohl (D)

http://rense.com/general79/seniors.htm
I hope the following 14 reasons are forwarded over and over again until they are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them. I have included the URL's for verification of the following facts:
1. $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens each year. http://tinyurl.com/zob77
2. $2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens. http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html
3. $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens. http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html
4. $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English! http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.0.html
5. $17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
6. $3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
7. 30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
8. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare and Social Services by the American taxpayers. http://premium.cnn.com/TRANSCIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.html
9. $200 Billion Dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two-and-a-half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US . http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0606/12/ldt.01.html
11. During the year of 2005 there were 4 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our Southern Border also, as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from Terrorist Countries. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin and marijuana, crossed into the U. S from the Southern border. Homeland Security Report. http://tinyurl.com/t9sht
12. The National Policy Institute, "estimated that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period." http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/pdf/deportation.pdf
13. In 2006 illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of origin. http://www.rense.com/general75/niht.htm
14. "The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration: Nearly One Million Sex Crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States ". http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml
Total cost is a whooping... $338.3 BILLION A YEAR!!!
If this doesn't bother you then just delete the message, but on the other hand, if it does raise the hair on the back of your neck, then forward it
Snopes is provided for doubters:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/bankofamerica.asp

Watershed Mark said...

I'm am glad the Arizona's Jon Kyl did not vote in favor of the bill above.