Pages

Sunday, September 11, 2005

Camelot Comes to Los Osos


“What do the simple folk dooooo /
to help them escape when they’re bloooooo . . . “

Ah, the noblesse obligeness of it all. In the Sept 10th Tribune is a touching story about the Los Osos Low Income Assistance Fund, $136,000 of private donated funds that will be made available to the deserving poor to help them pay for the $1,400 - $4,500 needed to decommission their septic tanks and hook up laterals to the $150-plus million Hideous Los Osos Sewer.

The story doesn’t say whether the over 700 households that may qualify would be expected to repay the money or whether it would be a gift. But let’s say the assistance would come in the form of a super low-cost loan and they’d be able to pay it back at the rate of $5 -$10 a month. A modest, affordable sum, wouldn’t you say, for someone who’s poor enough to qualify?

Ten dollars a month may be doable for really poor folks, so doesn’t this sound like a wonderful program? So considerate to help our community’s needy – the elderly or disabled folks on fixed incomes, the hard working “working-poor,” and so forth -- face this crushing financial burden, maybe even making it possible that they wouldn’t have to sell everything and move away. A sort of sweet noblesse oblige at work here. The sort of story intended to bring a tear to the eye, a story that one might think had been spun out right before a recall election to help the reader think that the CSD members being recalled actually cared a foodle about the estimated 30% of the town that would qualify as “bereft serf,” people facing financial ruin by this project, people who may be forced out of town. Downright tearjerking, if you ask me.

What's that? Ah, yes, I knew you had spotted it. No getting things past you, now is there?

If you are so poor you cannot possibly afford, let’s say, $10 a month to repay your sewer hook-up loan, what on earth are you going to do when the next month – and every month after that until the end of time – you get an additional $120 to $140 PLUS $40-plus bill from the CSD water office to repay the sewer construction loan and operating and maintenance expenses? And after a few months of not paying up, a lien is placed on your house and it's sold out from under you to pay off the rapidly accumulated debt, so you’re left to wonder why did you bother getting a hook-up loan since you had no way to possibly pay the far higher real sewer bill?

Yet there it is. Our CSD and the kind folks who set up this assistance fund, and Mike, our "No Spin” Public Information Officer, actually want the public to believe that people who are too poor to afford the $10 a month hook-up costs, will have no trouble paying the $160 to $180 monthly sewer bill.

Why, IT’S A MIRACLE!

Oh what do simple folk dooooooo. . . .? They dance, Arthur. THEY DANCE!

5 comments:

Shark Inlet said...

Did you miss the LOCSD newsletter that mentioned the $35M that Lois Capps got the house to approve or do you think there is no way the Senate and President will go along with a house resolution or are you just not bothering to mention good news that makes the CSD look like they are doing the right thing?

Curious.

Anonymous said...

There's a chance that it will go thru, but there's also a chance the amount would be reduced.

The fact is, it's not just the CSD that Ms. Calhoun cannot accept any action from. It's more telling about her non-acceptance of the designs of reputable wastewater system designers and water resouce consultants who have based their design on valid technology.

It's actually comedic that opponents yell at you if you state your preference to proceed with the project. It reminds me, well, of 1998 when the CSD election was being formed, and god forbid, anybody challenged the statements of the CSD proponents.

The people of Los Osos had no idea what they were doing then, and once again, they have no idea about what they are getting in to if they recall, other than the fact they'll get another temporary jolt of satisfaction of 'people power', until the reality of situation they've created sets in.

In Los Osos, the show must always go on, while the rest of San Luis Obispo county at this point could care less if equity of Los Osos goes down the toilet, so to speak.

Churadogs said...

Dear Shark, This community has been promised so many millions raining down from Washington like manna from heaven -- all for nought -- that I'll only consider it "good news" when we actually have check in hand.

As for Annonnymoose, I'm curious as to why you state that I won't accept designs from reputable designers and valid water consultants, etc. Huh? On what do you base that claim?

As for people yelling at you when you express support for the CSD's plan, heck, I've heard opponents getting yelled at by CSD supporters when they express support for alternative plans. Seems like it's Los Osos second favorite sport: hissing and yelling. so what else is new?

Shark Inlet said...

Fair 'nuff.

Still, it is sad when sewer foes actively try to keep Capps office from including money for Los Osos in the budget (or keep contractors from bidding on the project). It is almost as if they want it to be expensive.

Churadogs said...

Spectator, So, only Democrats voted for the Porter Cologne water act? Like Republicans didn't care about clean water? I don't think so. As for the poor getting it in the neck, the Coastal Act USED to have a provision in it that required any project that fell within their jurisdiction must be given "economic impact" consideration before being permitted. That section of the law was removed -- by Republicans at the behest of their developer friends??? so that economic impact of this sewer, for example, was NOT allowed to be considered. Indeed, Sarah Christie, formerly the Chair of the the CCC, if memory serves, was quoted as saying that removal of that economic impact section of the act ended up in helping to turn coastal areas into enclaves for the rich, instead of helping to preserve economic mixes in communities. In addition, the CSD refused and still refuses to do any affordability study on this project from day one. Was everyone on the CSD from day one Democrats? I don't think so. And, because they refused to link affordibility to any project and they set absolutely NO caps on this project -- it can't go into cost over runs since there is no limit -- it will cost whatever it costs -- the economic impact will be even more severs. Again, that was the CSD, not some evil Democrats in Sacramento that did that.