Tribune Writes Context Story, Los Osos Still Goes Missing!
In it’s March 19 “Second National Sunshine Week, Celebrating America’s Public Records Laws,” the Tribune headlined a quasi follow-up story on the previous one they’d run on the Los Osos CSD’s failure to follow state laws concerning getting public records requests out in the time required. The first story was, as usual, totally missing any context -- no notation that the CSD was, uh, beleaguered by some angry citizens attempting to break all their kneecaps, beset with citizen-sponsored lawsuits, and CSD sponsored lawsuits, and facing regime change, general mangers and office personnel put on leave until certain, uh, back-dated documents could be investigated, preparing agendas and paperwork for about a jillion public meetings, and so forth, that might explain (not excuse, but explain) this failure to get public records out in a timely manner.
Nor was there, in the original story, any attempt to compare the LOCSD’s failures with any other city, until a couple of days later, when this excellent story appeared. Headline, “CITIES HERE BALKING ON DOCUMENTS: Six of the county’s seven cities don’t honor requests for records that the law says they must.”
GOSH, you mean Los Osos isn’t alone? That six other cities, none of whom are going through the kind of turmoil and crushing paperwork problems Los Osos is, ALSO fail to comply with the state law? Well, Quel interesting. There was even a sidebar on a “list of the oldest [federal] pending requests” that have still not been filled, so clearly, this is something that’s very common.
And so I read through this whole new story to see if they’d refer back to the original Los Osos story, IN ORDER TO SET THAT STORY INTO CONTEXT and, naturally, that old horse went missing. Not a peep. Not a reference to Los Osos. Zip.
And so we’re left with the cart before the horse, then the cart shows up and the horse is gone missing. And that, of course is what “spin” is all about – separate cart and horse, lose horse. What “context” is all about is – connect cart, horse, traces, wheels, roadway and driver.
Good “watchdog” papers do the latter. The Tribune, alas, too often does the former.
Not known, now that Knight-Ridder has sold i’s holdings, whether the Trib’s new owners, the McClatchy News folks will bring a different editorial/journalistic ethos to the central coast. One can only hope.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
18 comments:
Ann,
Lemmie ask you a question because I wonder where you stand.
Do you find Lisa's answer, essentially something like "it isn't acceptable, but we're too busy and understaffed to boot" reasonable?
How about working overtime? How about hiring someone part time to help out in the office if you're so overworked? Such a person could help fill these requests for informamtion or perhaps lighten the load elsewhere to make it easier to comply with the law.
How about simply not putting all your key staffers on administrative leave?
I wonder whether Dan is going to be one of the applicants for the GM position. If so, I wonder whether this board likes or dislikes the job he has been doing so far. To me it doesn't appear that he's been running the office in a way that the board would approve of.
On the other hand, I've found it hard to predict what this board will do based on what they've said. After all, the men promised that they could get us an out of town plant for $100/month or less but it doesn't seem very likely.
Go pound sand inlet, you are so predictable and annoying. Go crawl back into Pandora's Box.
I guess that if you don't support the current LOCSD board you don't have the right to speak in the mind of the minority of Los Osos voters.
Sad, they. Pathetic too.
By the way folks, I want you all to know that I doubled up on the "smart pills", and the sneezing has gone away. But now I am even more confused. I cannot see both sides of a question, and even worse can't ride my bike without falling off. At least I do not sneeze "bullshit". But perhaps now I am writing "rabbit shit" when I disagree and have not created the facts. I need to create the facts first through my writing.
Sharkinlet,
Thanks for pointing out the nonsense that those that try to justify the CSD actions purvey.
It will not be too long until the CSD's actions will result in collapse and dissolutionment. Hang in there.
An admirer
"Shark Inlet said...
Ann,
Lemmie ask you a question because I wonder where you stand.
Do you find Lisa's answer, essentially something like "it isn't acceptable, but we're too busy and understaffed to boot" reasonable?"
Reasonable? Yes. Acceptable? No. Hopefully, with Karen Vega back, we'll get some "splainin' done.
"How about working overtime? How about hiring someone part time to help out in the office if you're so overworked? Such a person could help fill these requests for informamtion or perhaps lighten the load elsewhere to make it easier to comply with the law."
Inlet, are you volunteering?
"How about simply not putting all your key staffers on administrative leave?"
So far as I know, some key staffers were put on leave until the DA could investigate whether they broke the law by falsifying public documents by back-dating a contract. Discovering back-dated contrtacts would send a red flag up to me because you'd have to wonder what ELSE had been, uh, fiddled with. So, I would find it reasonable and prudent to restricty acces of public records by people who have, uh, back-dated stuff, until you could determine what the heck was going on.
"...whether Dan is going to be one of the applicants for the GM position."
If memory serves, he's a temporary and is now looking for a permanent GM.
"If so, I wonder whether this board likes or dislikes the job he has been doing so far. To me it doesn't appear that he's been running the office in a way that the board would approve of."
You'd need to check with the office to see when his evaluation is/will be done. Also, check to see a copy of his contract to see if the board can fire him at will (i.e. 30 day notice) or whether he has some longer contract. If I remember, WiulDan is Blesky's employer and they can send him wither they will and plug somebody else. I'm sure if the Board wasn't happy with his performance, his bosses at WilDan would have gotten a call by now.
Darn, I just woke up from a nap and realized I was "sleep writing" on my last comment again. Maybe I only make sense when I "sleep write".
just so every body knows, the anon on the "smart pills" is Shark Inlet. Shark is upset that someone spoofed one of his earlier comments in one of Ann's earlier posts. How sad for you Shark, is this what you been reduced to? "I know you are but, what am I". What's next? "Same to you but more of it?" I'm sure there is a vacancy for you in the adolescent unit at Atascadero State. Why don't you let us all in on who you really are so we can intervene and make that call for you?
I'm starting to even confuse myself. In my last post, I say "I guess that if you don't support the current LOCSD board you don't have the right to speak in the mind of the minority of Los Osos voters." But on several occasions, I have stated that "I am not a dissolutionist". What in the hell am I talking about? Oh my God, I am so full of shit. Of course, I'm a dissolutionist. It was my idea to start the dissolution movement in the first place. The last thing that I want to see is a community united behind any sensible sustainable wastewater plan. It was my idea to propogate the divisiveness in our community. I love all this infighting thats going on. I'm for the dissolution. I signed the petition. Three times. As long as our community stays divided we will never have a wastewater project. I'm also infavor of all the property owners getting CDOs because I lobbied the RWQCB to fine all my neighbors out of existence. I'm so happy that all the property owners in Los Osos are going to be getting CDOs it makes my toes curl. And I have very big ugly toes. Wait a second, there is something else that doesn't make much sense about my last post. I use to be a "dreramer" before the community voted against me and my project so doesn't that put me in the Minority? That's right, I'M THE MINORITY VOTER. Shit, what was I thinking? Wow those "smart pills" that I took off the "Anon" after I stopped laughing when anon fell off the bike must be starting to kick in. Doesn't just make you laugh to see people hurt themselves? Kind of like I'm hurting Los Osos by supporting dissolution. Isn't this funny? What a laugh riot. The way I've fucked over this community just makes me want to laugh out loud, You know what? Come to think of it, INSTEAD of campaigning for a divided community thru the dissolution movement which will result in a path to 30 more years of delay and non-solution, maybe THE BEST IDEA IS TO SUPPORT the CSD and their plan for an interim septic management/water conservation program in prelude to a wastewater facility. It makes a lot more sense than the CDO's that I lobbied the RWQCB to place on all my asshole riff-raff neighbors that I want to displace out of our town. Like that little old lady on a fixed income that lives down the street. Damn, I wish she'd just die already. But, anyway, something tells me that when the RQWCB realized what a huge nightmare it is that they are creating for themself, and let's face it, they have no fucking clue what they are doing. Anybody with half a brain can see that the CDOs are the biggest non-solution of all and actually in every possible way will make the water quality and wastewater and water supply problem in Los Osos worse. When the RWQCB realizes what it is that they are actually doing to themselves by destroying their own credibility, something tells me they will probably back off these CDOs. When they see the plan our current CSD is moving towards, an interim septic management/water conservation program in prelude to a wastewater facility that the community actually supports, I think the RWQCB will actually get behind our CSD and support this plan. Unless, of course, I can fuck it up for everyone like I did when the County was about to build a sewer project and I lied to everybody and told them "cheeper, better, faster". Then, seven years later, presented the community with a sludge factory next to the library and across the street from a church that was going to cost them $204 a month. I'm still not sure why Los Osos voted against us. Maybe it was the part where we tried to force the fucking project down everyone's throat before letting them vote on it. Oh well, just so everybody knows, I'm going to try my hardest to fuck everything up for everyone in Los Osos like I did back in 1998 when the County was ready to build you a sewer. The dissolution movement and the CDOs are just my latest ideas to fuck over Los Osos. If these fail, I'm sure I'll think of something else. Cause, I'm one sick and twisted mutherfucker.....So, if you don't want to support me in my campaign for a divided community via the dissolution movement then fuck you. Then last thing I want to see is the community coming together in support of a interim septic management/water conservation program in prelude to a viable wastewater project. I hope that the realitors don't realize that the CDOs that I lobbied for would actually put them out of business. Fuck, I hope all the vancant lot owners and realitors don't realize that if they get behind our current CSD board and the people of Los Osos, there might actually be an end in sight. I hope nobady realizes that dissolution = 30 more years of non-solution and delay......I hope nobody realizes what idiot jerks me and my gang of "solutions group/dreamer/taxpayer watch/dissolution/CDO supporting buddies have been. I hope nobody realizes how much we've fucked over this town....
Ann,
It might be a good idea to see if you can get Greg to figure out how to keep such spoofing from happening. This is on your watch on his board and I would hope that if the two of you value discussion you would deal with it somehow.
Yes Ann,
If what Shark Inlet 11:29pm said wasn't true, It wouldn't bother me at all. But, this truth that I speak at 11:29pm is just way too painful. I can't take it anymore. Make it stop Ann. Please, make it stop........
"911 Emergency.......
....."Yes, we have a psychotic schizophrenic that has been posting to our blog by the name of Shark Inlet...we were wondering if you could send somebody out, I've heard there are vacancies in the cuckoo hut at Atascadero State."
Oh, I'm so sorry, but the people in the cuckoo hut are in recovery and we can't expose them to the likes of Shark Inlet. They might regress....besides Shark might try and stuff and clog all our toilets so no one can go poo poo anymore kind of like the evil "bullshit" Shark is spewing in Los Osos with the Dissolution movement and the CDOs that Shark begged the RWQCB to inforce on all the property owners in Los Osos...but, I wouldn't worry too much about it. When the people of Los Osos start to realize how ridiculous the CDOs and the dissolution movement is .....that it's just another futile attempt by Shark to DIVIDE the community, I think that most of the good people of Los Osos will finally realize what a nut job Shark is and you'll get behind the new CSD and work towards a final solution finally. Then, Shark will finally fade into the dark and distant shadows from whence it came......
Shark, don't bother.
It's not about responding or debating, it's important for some people to try to denigrate you (because it feeds their ego).
It's kind of like 'Lord of the Flies'. The ones that yell the loudest take know that yelling the loudest works.
It's called hating one into submission. If they can't debate you, they'll try to hate you until you go away.
Shark, you see what happens when you take "smart pills"? You go from rational to totally irrational. You start writing with the intelligence of a rabbit, and use foul language. You never had this problem before! Do not take "smart pills"!
I am happy ananymous is not sneezing anymore, but the double dose as suggested by Mike Green is not helping the poor guy's rationality at all. Now he is making 911 calls. Perhaps he should go cold turkey. If he does, I would like an update on the possible withdrawal pains. Entering reality can be very painful.
I have learned a great truth from this blog: Be VERY careful of taking anybody else's medicine.
Well, I see you kids seem to having a grand time. To the "real" Shark Inlet, if I shut off the comment section of the blog, I doubt that will make anyone happy. I can certainly check with Greg to see if this blogsite has specific blockers, but somehow I doubt it. I think it's pretty basic: On or Off. And since people can post anonymously (so far Mike Green and Ron Crawford are the only folks who've self identified) that opens the way for typical "anonymous" silliness, like you're seeing now. Clearly, the "faux" inlet has made his point, so I can only hope he'll move on to other things. Meantime, his "voice" is certainly recognizable so perhaps folks interested in using this as a valid discussion forum can sort out the phony inlet from the real one: ignore the former, and continue to engage the latter? If any of the others who post comments here have any other ideas, please post them.
Ann,
The quick way of finding out who is who is to right-click on the handle of the poster and then open the file in a new window. The "real" inlet dates back to August 2005 but the "fake" inlet dates back to March 2006.
As to what Greg can do ... I don't know that he can do anything, but I would presume he wouldn't like such spoofing and he can probably look into whether such activity would violate the terms of use. If so, the "fake" account could be shut off.
The Shark spoof is fabulous! Can you draw cartoons too? Personally I find the real Shark to be intelligent and somewhat engaging...certainly informative. It's just fun to see him flipped on his head to get an alternative perspective.
Shark inlet said above: "As to what Greg can do ... I don't know that he can do anything, but I would presume he wouldn't like such spoofing and he can probably look into whether such activity would violate the terms of use. If so, the "fake" account could be shut off."
So couldn't "fake poster" just log in under a different "fake name?" and start his game all over again?
One interesting thing about "anonymous" anybodies, is except for me, Mike Green and Ron Crawford, NOBODY knows who anybody is. You all could be spoofing. Register under different handles every few months and "invent" a different writing style or point of view, and type away. Who's to know?
That's one of the powers and dangers of the internet -- it's very hard to know who's who. In my case, anyone who's been reading my columns can track both my style and content over the years, they're free to identify me by my silly socks at public meetings, my mug goes out over the TV when I stand up and identify myself during public comment, folks can call me up and chat, stop me in the middle of the supermarket & etc. I'm a known quanity.
Not so for most of the commentors on this blogsite. Nobody knows who they are. Quite a game, and hence the door is always open for mischief
Post a Comment