Pages

Friday, March 14, 2008

Stuck At The Corner of Then and Now

Calhoun’s Can(n)ons, printed in The Bay News
Tolosa Press, SLO, Ca for March 13, 2008.

The Law in its majestic equality forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread. --Anatole France

At the corner of Have and Have Not, the crossroads of Past and Future, a curious battle is brewing between long-time rancher, Dan De Vaul and SLO County over Whatever shall we do with the extremely valuable property at the corner of Develop and Not Develop, otherwise known as Foothill and Los Osos Valley Road.

Like so many farms and ranches in this county, De Vaul has seen his land rapidly get surrounded by high-end housing incompatible with farming and ranching. Owners of million dollar "ranchettes" might think their million-dollar views of a quaint "farm" are splendid until plowing dust blows in the window, followed by the scent of cow poop. And when the sound of recalcitrant tractors or chain saws coughing and whining in the dawn hours wake them up, "bucolic" isn’t the word that comes to mind.

Start with a years-long gleeful battle by a self described "irascible" De Vaul pushing-the-buttons of various County regulators over various code violations, permits and zoning issues-–with the County regulators pushing right back--then add into the mix the powder-keg arrival of about 50 recovering alcoholics/addicts, including convicted sex offenders, who set up a non-profit, self-help, live-in, certified California Association of Addiction Recovery Resources recovery program called Sunny Acres. The "clients" slept in a barn that had no permit for such use, and suddenly there was the perfect storm of straight-forward issues, hidden agendas, political manipulation, delicious grandstanding, not-so secret fears, moral loathing and class warfare, economic pressure, civil shirking and buck-passing and finally a tent city once again blooming right next to LOVR for maximum in-your-face public exposure.

While the De Vaul battle may be seen as entertaining or annoying, it does bring to public consciousness a growing problem in our beautiful but expensive, rapidly upscaling, soon-to-be totally unaffordable community: Whatever shall we do with the poor, the sick, the halt, the lame, the broken, the broke?

Traditionally, the poor, the homeless, the down-and-out were shoveled into the poorest parts of town to various "Midnight Missions" located in low-cost "Skid Rows," out of sight, out of mind. But where, in this County, is there anyplace that can be defined as "affordable" that hasn't already been snapped up by developers or penciled in at the Planning Department, property all ready to be developed, renovated, repaired, rebuilt, renewed, upscaled and resold--at very high prices?

And where, in this County, do people go to get live-in drug and alcohol treatment services? County General was closed long ago. And the people who break and need time to repair, where do they live if they have jobs that are always one paycheck away from the disaster of eviction? Or no job at all? Then when the County's broke, the State's broke, the whole nation's up to its eyeballs in debt, and economic reality means that "affordable" housing remains an unrealistic inside joke penciled in on planners’ blueprints, and universal health care still remains a dream, and NIMBYs see that integrated community-based mental-health/addiction treatment care centers never get built, then it's no wonder we saw DeVaul's ad-hoc compassion and the neighbors' economic/political power colliding at the corner of Foothill and LOVR.

It's a collision that now can have several endings. Mr. DeVaul could pull an "Alex Madonna" and threaten to build a piggery on his property–-it’s a working farm, after all. Maybe put in a few thousand chickens as well? Sell nice fresh bacon and eggs?

Or perhaps all the stake holders in this particular drama could agree on a win/win strategy: The county could partner on building and running a properly supervised live-in, clean-and-sober drug/alcohol recovery center, thereby bringing Sunny Acres into compliance with the various county regulations concerning permitted use of his property, the public could donate money, goods and services to help this whole enterprise, thereby demonstrating the compassion and care the people of this county are famous for, and the neighbors could finally acknowledge that "bucolic," in the real world, often comes with some unexpected and challenging realities.

4 comments:

Ron said...

Ann wrote:

"NIMBYs"

I'm actually a big fan of the "Not in my backyard" argument, as long as it's in the proper sequence -- the "backyard" has to exist BEFORE the "not in my."

Take Templeton, for example. They put in a bunch of houses right next to a cattle lot that's been there for decades. So, of course, what's the first thing the new neighbors do? Start whining about the smell of the cattle lot.

When NIMBY is in that sequence, the argument loses a lot of its zing, and that's how it is with the De Vaul issue.

If I don't want to hear jets all day, I don't buy a house next to an airport.

"rapidly upscaling"

The older I get, the more I hate the word "upscale."

"Sell nice fresh bacon and eggs? "

That'd be awesome!

Mike Green said...

"Sell nice fresh bacon and eggs? "

I wonder why one use would preclude the other?

A nice local farm run by the folks getting help,
I'd buy that food in a heartbeat.
In an earlier post Shark and I mentioned the M. Polan books ( Botany of Desire and the Omnivore's Dilemma)
I'd like to add another, by Barbara Kingsolver, (the big time author) "Animal, Vegetable, Miracle"
Thoughtful commentary on our modern food system illuminated through the workings of a small family farm.
There is also a good article in this weeks New Times written by a occupant of Sunny Acres.
I hope something can be done, success like Sunny Acres is hard to duplicate.

Churadogs said...

Mike sez:"A nice local farm run by the folks getting help,
I'd buy that food in a heartbeat."

That's what I don't get. I've bought wine barrel planters there lots of time. I don't know who was running that particular operation (part of Sunny Acres? strictly a private, for-profit deal?) but the barrels were swell. Got a bunch of petunias in them even years later. I mentioned in a previous post on this issue, the wonderful organization running "Growing Grounds." Hellllooooo?? It can be done and done well and I know a lot of people would support the effort. Time to put some heads together, methinks.

Alon Perlman said...

Hi Ann, this is the second "Loathing" in the blog so I thought I would drop it here For SAFE KEEPING. copying a picture from a Face book file is pretty low.
Actually sending threatning messages to my contacts is beyond the human pale
Everything I have done in Los Osos has been an Open Book
The OCHSJOKE is simply harrasement
perhaps people can open their eyes now.
Any way ann I assume your notification alert is off. but lt me know if you want to delete this.
as my policy is "Real Transparncy but ya gotta be smart to find it."
BTW there is no robert Allen The missing Eye is reference to either Razor or his father posing as openeye
+++++++=======
Alon Perlman said...
So are you winking your little brown eye at us to let us know that you ARE Quietbay, Robert? ;)
Besides, Someone famous who runs the Show said on that radio show that "Lisa's Complaint" is Now Passe. I'm afraid I'm going to go with the "realer" person. You'd better not anger her, you know what she is like.
The Golden Rule, Robert Allen Kingsley, I looked you up.
54 years old, 5'6",
Black hair, Brown eye(s),One Possibly lost due to that major Car Accident you had in 2002?
Social Security # Etc...
Word Verification=treatly
As in Mathew 6:53
Treatly thine brother as you shall wantest thine brother to treatley you, and psseth no rumor upon his good name, nor stateth thou that which thy cannest deliver, nor shal thy dresseth in the garb of another for to lay your neigbhor astray. Nor shalt thou wastet the sands of the hourglass nor the labors of those who toil to do for others that which you havent. And to you Mikael, and to he who was one a rich king; readeth the wise words of several posts ago and as you reachest the fork in the path in the forest know that it is as the wise man said and you will find yourself barking up the new tree that is as the one thou thought had left behind before.

6:53 PM, March 19, 2010


TheOpenEye said...
Uh, Alon, are you talking to me?

Am I supposed to be Quietbay?

I don't think "Schicker's Complaint" is passe -- it was -- but it's not now. You would know a lot more about her anger than I would. You're the one who called her a "F-- B----," remember?

Regarding the Golden Rule: You can't preach it unless you practice it and that leaves you out.

Maybe in your next life you will return as a cow grazing in front of a Burger King and wish you had treated people a whole lot better.

Just a thought.

8:47 PM, March 19, 2010


alabamasue said...
TheOpenEye sounds a lot like quietbay who sounds a lot like "____ ____" (he-whose-name-cannot-be-mentioned, at least on this blog) No one reads his garbage blog, so he inflicts his wackiness here. He is not 54, people, more like 26. There is no 'Robert Allen Kingsley' listed as a landowner in the PZ. And, by the way- Schicker was just a poor sick prematurely old woman who tried to cover up her lack of experience with bombast "We had a plan, we really did! Until they didn't.

9:22 PM, March 19, 2010