Pages

Friday, June 19, 2009

Oh, Dear Gawwwdd, Noooo! Noooo!

If it’s one thing Mother Calhoun’s doesn’t want to read about over her morning coffee, it’s the words “creepy” and [fired former County Administrator] “Dave Edge” and “nipples” and [Assistant County Administrator] “Gail Wilcox.” Mother Calhoun also doesn’t want to read about anyone getting “black stockings and lingerie,” and “how (Wilcox) may want to satisfy herself sexually,” or Edge "pouting." Pouting? Nuh-huh. No. Nope.

But, there we are with the morning Tribune and the Edge/Wilcox miasma dribbling out as such cases always do. Ms. Wilcox has filed a lawsuit (posted at the Tribune at http://media.sanluisobispo.com/smedia/2009/06/17/wilcox.source.prod_ ). It makes for, uh, interesting reading, as it is, in many ways, a playbook for how these things transpire. And there’s some interesting points that the county may need to take a closer look at if they want to avoid this mess again.

First of interest is that Wilcox lawsuit claims that “Between 1999 and May 2009, Edge engaged in ongoing harassing conduct toward Plaintiff and was intrusive and abused his power and control to create a hostile working environment for Plaintiff. Ten years? And nobody said anything until a few months ago? Or is it more likely that the reality was that what started out as a “close” friendship slid off into something “creepy” and went bad a few years later, with both parties now trapped in a mess of their own making, but unable to figure a way out, in a system set up to only make things worse?

Which brings us to the following excerpts: 1)” The previous Human Resources Director at one point attempted to intervene on Plaintiff’s behalf and Edge made it clear to her that she should not get involved” and 2) “The previous Human Resources Director served at will and could be terminated without cause.” You see the problem when HR is serving “at will” to anybody? HR is supposed to be the bulwark and protection for employees. If they can be fired by the one doing the harassing, bank on it, you will have a mess on your hands sooner or later.

Plus, “County Counsel acknowledged [in the meeting with HR Director] that Edge had made inappropriate comments to a female attorney in his office in the past [no date given, not known how far in the past], county counsel stated that a second female attorney in the office reported inappropriate behavior by Edge.” A second report of inappropriate behavior, in the office of county counsel, no less, and nothing was done? That’ll GUARANTEE a lawsuit against the county somewhere down the line.

And, “Edge had engaged in [inappropriate comments for years, comments made in front of other ranking managers, yet]” at no time was any investigative action undertaken with respect to that conduct.” Reason two why it’s guaranteed the county will get sued.

If you recall, the BOS held their little BS meeting and nattered on about the reason they were firing (at will) Edge was because of philosophical differences and other horse woggle. The above excerpts from Wilcox’s lawsuit give you a glimpse as to what was really going on. And here’s the capper as to why these things ALWAYS break bad when you try to cut corners, cover your ass, lie, try to bury the bodies and think it’ll all just go away. No. These cases always involve MAD (mutually assured destruction) on the part of all players, and the following illustrates perfectly what was in play:

“When [Wilcox] asked HR Director why “may” instead of “will,” (as in the county counsel “may” tell Edge to cease all contact with Wilcox] HR Director told Plaintiff that there was no basis for telling Edge this [absolutely, officially, cease all contact] because there was not going to be an investigation into sexual harassment allegations because Edge was leaving. County officials then contacted Plaintiff’s attorney and advised that upon learning of sexual harassment allegations against him, Edge told county officials about Plaintiff’s relationship with [another county] employee.”

Did you hear the boom from the shot across the bow? MAD at work. And the county then knew that all of this was gonna move to the killing ground. Which is where it is now, despite the best efforts of the county to bury this and try to make it all go away. It never does. It just gets worse, including news stories about nipples and sexual awakenings and black lingerie.

But until the County tackles what is clearly some administrative weaknesses in how they are running the office, so to speak, this mess will happen again. One of the ironies is that Edge was hired, after a spate of sexual follies by various administrators, (all of whom were protected under civil service, except for Paul Floyd, who was elected and so couldn’t be fired at will), and restructuring to put CEOs under the direct control of the BOS was likely seen as a better way to be more responsive. But without any proper checks and balances, who will watch the watchers? If the previous HR Director served “at will” there could be no protection offered there if the HR Director’s “boss” was the one doing the harassing. And if inappropriate comments are received by TWO attorneys in the county counsel’s office, fer Chrissakes, and nothing was done . . . .?

Lawsuit city. And the taxpayer’s gonna eat it all. And that really doesn’t go down well with Mother Calhoun’s morning coffee.

19 comments:

Watershed Mark said...

Mother Calhoun wrote:

Plus, “County Counsel acknowledged [in the meeting with HR Director] that Edge had made inappropriate comments to a female attorney in his office in the past [no date given, not known how far in the past], county counsel stated that a second female attorney in the office reported inappropriate behavior by Edge.” A second report of inappropriate behavior, in the office of county counsel, no less, and nothing was done?

County Counsel conveniently conflicted.
So sex trumps sewage or does it?

I remember Gail over ruling David when Paavo asked for the first or second round funding LOWWP funding request at a on the record BOS Meeting, after David warned The Supes that the county didn't have the funds to spend. Gail then spoke that the county could simply “throw it" on next year’s budget. Talk about love triangles.

Could Gail be pre-empting the inevitable financial review/audit, by now pulling the golden parachute while extricating herself from any and all liability for her "throw it on next year’s budget” recommendation, simultaneously? Settlements get paid especially when pensions don’t…At any rate the BOS have the ultimate responsibility.

It will be interesting if David offers any information regarding how much clout or cover Gail had or provided.
I’m still trying to figure how Warren wiggles his way in or out. Ten years worth of unresolved sex stunts smells fishy. I mean why now Gail?

BTW, why was vacuum collection never studied by Paavo’s handpicked/no bid/sole source consulting engineer?
That is an investigation worth the county counsel’s time if he isn’t too conflicted to do it, the people will pay either way.

Realistic1 said...

The sordid details have come out. I guess Ron's fantasy that Edge's firing had something to do with the "grand sewer conspiracy" has gone down in flames.

Ron said...

First off, thank you Ann for NOT including pictures with this post.

R1 wrote:

"I guess Ron's fantasy that Edge's firing had something to do with the "grand sewer conspiracy" has gone down in flames."

And, I guess that Franc4 is 100-percent right -- you people don't know how to read. (What's up with that, anyway?)

For the FIFTH time, what I wrote was:

"Is Edge's possible termination related to his position on the Los Osos wastewater project? I have no idea..."

However, with that being said, everything I wrote in that post is, as usual, nails tight.

Fact: Edge no longer has to recuse himself from the sewer discussion. That's a fact (and I'd be very interested in speaking with him on that subject, however, after those CalCoastNews stories, I can only imagine how he feels about on-line journalism these days. Hopefully, I can carve out some time, soon, to talk with him. His takes on the sewer story have got to be flat-out amazing.)

Fact: If someone goes against Nash-Karner, that person gets hammered (right, Norm Hantzche, George Gibson, Bill Coy, Julie Tacker, Lisa Schicker, oh, just on and on and on...?), and this seemed like a good time to remind everyone of that fact.

Fact: Edge lives in Los Osos.

Fact: 10 years? And NOW it... errr... (fill in your own dirty joke here).

Fact: I have a very interesting question: Does Gail Wilcox know Pandora Nash-Karner?

That's a fact... that I have that excellent question.

Wanna see an interesting Google search:

allegedly

Now, check this out:

"Mother Calhoun also doesn’t want to read about anyone getting “black stockings and lingerie,” and “how (Wilcox) may want to satisfy herself sexually,” or Edge "pouting.""

and;

"Mother Calhoun also doesn’t want to read about anyone allegedly getting “black stockings and lingerie,” and “how (Wilcox) allegedly may want to satisfy herself sexually,” or Edge allegedly "pouting.""

Big difference, yes?

Gotta go shower, now.

Realistic1 said...

Ron,

If you had no idea (and certainly no evidence) then why did you even make the statement?

We all know the answer - you made the statement to create the rumor that the two things were related, cuz that's what you do...spread rumors that support your theory that Pandora is the puppetmaster behind everyone and everything.

You are a sleezy "journalist" of the worst kind, Ron.

TCG said...

Some of your best writing, Ann. My wife and I cracked up reading your piece this morning, although the situation that has occurred in the County Administrative office is certainly not funny.

Ron said...

Just to clarify...

I don't mean to put the alleged victim on trial here. IF Edge did what Wilcox's lawsuit is alleging, then, yes, that's very bad, and dumb. Yes.

However -- and this is unfortunate for Wilcox, if what she is alleging is true -- there all of these other undeniably weird circumstances involved with this story that complicate matters, and considering all of the other circumstances involved with this story, my questions are perfectly valid questions. Hey, if there's nothing there, then there's nothing there.

But, I mean, c'mon, look at this: If Edge didn't live in the PZ for the last ten years (at least), and if Nash-Karner wasn't directly responsible for "better, cheaper, faster," and if Nash-Karner wasn't Bruce Gibson's Parks Commissioner, and if the alleged improprieties found in the Wilcox lawsuit hadn't been going on for 10 years, allegedly, and NOW, when the county's sewer development process is in a critical stage, this all spills out, and if Nash-Karner had not written things like: "We MUST save this (Tri-W) project!!!!!," and if she also didn't have a (documented) 20-year track record of absolutely hammering everyone that wasn't on her side (just ask Norm Hantzsche), and if it wasn't for the fact that I've got a case of Heineken that says Edge WASN'T one of the only 9-percent of PZ residents that checked the "Mid-town (Tri-W) site" on the community survey, and if the 1999 - 2005 LOCSD (that included Nash-Karner) hadn't wasted $25 million of Edge's tax money developing the Tri-W embarrassment, and if Nash-Karner had not "hoped" that Edge's own local government "gets fined out of existence" (by the way, the e-mail that Nash-Karner wrote that line in, was to David Edge), and if Edge himself hadn't practically begged the Supervisors for a full investigation into his own firing, well, then I wouldn't have any suspicions at all.

But considering ALL of that is true, then, yeah, you're damn right I'm gonna have a coupla questions about his dismissal. Very valid, fair, tough questions.

In fact, considering ALL of that is true, it would be inappropriate to NOT ask these questions. (For gawd's sake, Pandora's infamous "fined out of existence" e-mail was to David Edge!)

And, if there's nothing there, then there's nothing there.

But, good lord, can you blame me for being suspicious? Look at all of that. And, like I wrote, the fact that all of that DOES exist, is unfortunate for Wilcox.

Plus, there's this: IF what Wilcox is alleging is true, how does that harm Edge's reliability as a source on matters involving a major public works project? He's still super smart on that stuff, isn't he? And, as far as MY story's concerned, that's all I'm interested in.

However, let me call my shot here: Since I've covered Pandora's "behavior-based marketing" strategies over the past 20 years, so, I'm VERY familiar with how she operates, if I ever do get the opportunity to speak with Edge regarding the LO sewer situation, and he tells me what I already know he's going to tell me (about how f-d up the entire "better, cheaper, faster"/"bait and switchy" Tri-W disaster [hey, that rhymes] situation was/is), the first thing the tiny handful of Tri-W nut jobs will do, is hammer away at him, and they'll use the Wilcox lawsuit as the hammer.

I already know that is going to happen.

Unknown said...

Pandora again thanks you Ron for the invaluable publicity... Without your constant support, she would have probably lived a quiet life supporting her favorite park.... But thanks Ron, she is enjoying the wonderful publicity...

Realistic1 said...

Once again, Ron, the only source you reference to prove that Pandora "hammered" Norm Hantzche is yourself. It happened because you said it did? Just like your conversation with Steve Monowitz? We have nobody's word but yours. And because you say these things allegedly happened, that justifies your implication that Pandora was somehow responsible for David Edge's termination when there was not even a whisper whatsoever of that being true? And now we have Gail Wilcox's sordid lawsuit to prove you wrong.

Your whole post strikes me as a massive rationalization - and is just another indicator that you are truly "Pandora paranoid". Honestly man, that old "if it happened in Los Osos or the County government it MUST be Pandora's fault" song and dance is getting pretty tired.

Alon Perlman said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Alon Perlman said...

The 6 points that Ann posted Calhoun’s Can(n)ons for May 21, 2009, should be chanted out loud by executives attending sexual harrasment trainings everywhere.

Or, maybe it's just a "Vision thing"

He said, she said, they said.
Whoever has the most documentation "wins"
Word Verification; cringr

Churadogs said...

Alon sez:"The 6 points that Ann posted Calhoun’s Can(n)ons for May 21, 2009, should be chanted out loud by executives attending sexual harrasment trainings everywhere."

That's the sad part: nobody learns anything. Sigh. On the other hand, if the BOS takes a close look they perhaps will see a "System" failure here and correct that so we'll have relative quiet for another 10 years. (There is no fixing the human misery these things cause. Another sigh.)

Watershed Mark said...

Investigation into claims by assistant administrator may arrive next week

If Warren overlooked, ignored or didn't acknowledge an actionable event in his office and as a result a disinterested $300.00 3rd party Lawyer must be brought in to investigate his "oversight" it is logical to ask:

What else is Warren missing?

If Warren is missing the obvious it makes his review of Lisa’s complaint questionable indeed.
Perhaps Fitzgerald, Abbott & Beardsley can help recommend a firm who can be engaged to look into why “vacuum collection was never studied by Paavo’s handpicked/no bid/sole source consulting engineer.

We wouldn’t want Warren wanting should any “conflict of interest” ultimately be determined.
In other words, how is Warren’s client loyalty determined, if the citizens are footing his salary/bill?

Where is the conflict of interest waiver from the people, by the people and for the people?
Fascinating actually…Like the California AG supporting the WB instead of "the people" who are paying the bill.

Seeems a challance is in order.
Perhaps the SLOCO LOWWP is a natural place to begin.
Fascinating really. Huh?

Watershed Mark said...

Seems a challenge is in order.
Los Osos is already making history, so why not a little unintended consequence?

Churadogs said...

Mark sez:"Where is the conflict of interest waiver from the people, by the people and for the people?
Fascinating actually…Like the California AG supporting the WB instead of "the people" who are paying the bill."

that's always been the fascinating part. We the People pay the bill of the people who then defend THE STATE against The People. The People have to go hire private lawyers to defend them, hence they end up paying twice. Nuts.

Unknown said...

Are YOU complaining that "We the People", although it includes YOU, it doesn't reward extremism... "We the People" is not "Me the People"...

Lisa Schicker, Gail McPherson, Julie Tacker, nor Ann Calhoun are "We the People" all by themselves...!!!!!

There are a great many others represented in "We the People" and we don't all agree with the "Me the People" prospectives espoused by those 4 individuals or most of the others who have the need to parade in front of the BOS in their agenda of, not just moving the sewer, but of trying to create as any costly delays as possible...

There are a great many of us who are tired of the Schicker circus and the "Me the People" campaign...

Watershed Mark said...

MIKE: You are a county sheople who wants a big leaky polluting over priced pipe buried deep in your drinking water, so your interests are "represented".

Churadogs said...

Mike misunderstands, again, and misreads, again, and makes stuff up again, when he sez:"Are YOU complaining that "We the People", although it includes YOU, it doesn't reward extremism... "We the People" is not "Me the People"...

Lisa Schicker, Gail McPherson, Julie Tacker, nor Ann Calhoun are "We the People" all by themselves...!!!!! "

Uh, Mike, think maybe you need to go back and read what I wrote. This comment doesn't even make sense . . . even for you.

Unknown said...

Sorry Ann, but it is YOU who does not understand...!!!

YOU are one of those "ME the People"... YOU do not understand that all you are doing is to continue the circus of creating as many delays as possible and as a result, create the most expensive sewer on earth... At least you are not as nasty as Piper, but you still are one of the active cheerleaders trying to nitpik and find fault in everything every responsible group (pre-recall CSD, current BOS, State Wate Board) has proposed to promote clean drinking water in Los Osos... Your signature on the PZLDF Lawsuit and non-payment of your portion of the agreement show exactly what you are about...

You, Ann, are not my representative to the BOS, neither is Schicker or Tacker...

Anonymous said...

Hola Folks from Panama!

My idea is that if this sewer is delayed, Mike is correct! It may end up the most expensive sewer ever constructed, but it may never be constructed. And then what?

So it is not constructed. At this point it seems to me that California and the Feds are falling apart. No mun, no fun.

Sewer in 15 years? Maybe! In the meantime Los Osos continues to revert to a slum. Or maybe not!

Mike: we can filter the water that we drink by RO (reverse osmosis) on the tap. We can bathe in high nitrogen water.

So what is this all about except for a bunch of non practical environmentalists forcing all this down our throats?

The fact is: yes, we can crap in our own wells and clean the water up for drinking. We can disinfect it for washing. And we can make it soft.

What is this all about?