Pages

Thursday, April 03, 2008

How Much Is That Doggie In the Window, Part Duh

Bwa-hahahah, The American Kennel Club, ya gotta love ‘em!

As those of you with “purebred” dogs know, the AKC maintains a “Stud Registry” (tax free, I might add. And remember, you, dear tax payer, have to make up for anything “tax free.”). The Stud Registry pretends to be a listing of all purebred dogs and their ancestry and as such pretends to be offering a “service.” Alas, according to a former top AKC Investigator , on ABC World News Tonight a few years ago, fifty percent of that registry is no good, phony, meaningless, primarily because the registry isn’t and wasn’t “culled” when phony entries showed up. And according to a letter I received from the then-AKC Board President a few years ago, the stud registry has never been audited. Never.

But the AKC maintains the delightful fiction that the registry is important enough to keep getting tax free status for it, and that if you want to participate in AKC dog shows, you must “register” your dog, a registration program that most people believe means the dog actually is “purebred,” or at least descended from the parents listed on the form & etc. Bwa-hahahaha. At least 50% of the time – not true.

Oh, and did I forget to mention, the dog owner pays the AKC a fee for that registration form. That form is sent through the U.S. Mails. Sending stuff you know to be worthless to people who don’t know it’s worthless because you, uh, forgot to tell them, and have them pay good money for, and using the U.S. mails to do it is called Mail Fraud. If 50% if that Stud Registry is no good, and the AKC has evidence from their own inspectors as to just what and who on that registry is no good and the registry is not purged or audited so the no-good entries simply keep compounding over the years, well that means you’re knowingly mailing out millions of dollars of worthless paper each year. Ooohhh, naughty, naughty.

The DA for the Southern District of New York knows all about the fraud. He got boxes and boxes of CDs as evidence in a mail fraud inquiry and . . . are you ready for it? . . . “declined to prosecute.” Need I point out that the AKC is a multi-million dollar a year organization whose headquarters are located in . . . yep, you guessed it . . . .the Southern District of New York?

Ah, yes. Well, as Herm David (highly placed and well known dog world personage) once said of the AKC scheme: It’s a perfect scheme. They sell pieces of paper with numbers printed on them. They have an unlimited amount of numbers at their disposal.

But now comes this new AKC scheme – it’s even better than the worthless “Purebred” papers scheme. This one doesn’t even pretend to mean anything about the dog except that it be “distinguishable as a member of an AKC registerable breed,” that is that it sort of looks like some kind of purebred.

In other words, a quasi-purebred-looking MUTT.

So why would you send nice money to AKC to get back a piece of paper with numbers on it? Well, if you wanted to enter your dog in AKC sponsored events such as Agility Trials, Earthdog Trials (where small terrier types compete to show their rat chasing abilities), Junior Showmanship (your kid wants to learn how to “show” dogs), lure coursing, (chasing a “plastic bag bunny” on a cord, high speed, really exciting sport for various sighthounds), obedience trials and so forth. ALL EVENTS WHICH ARE NOT BASED ON CONFORMATION (what the dog looks like) BUT BASED ON ABILITY, WHICH MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH “PUREBREDNESS.” Tracking dogs, search and rescue dogs, for example are often mutts. Ditto drug sniffing dogs, mutts rescued from the pound. And so forth.

But here’s where the AKC’s (genetic? inbred?) inability to be truthful comes in. The club had a program called “Indefinite Listing Privilege (ILP) program. This was for folks who for some reason couldn’t “prove” their dog was purebred and so couldn’t get it “registered” in the Stud Registry (you know, the one that’s 50% no good in the first place) but still wanted to participate in the various activities listed above. But ILP doesn’t quite do it, so now AKC, in their eternal trolling for mo’ money, have “enhanced” and renamed the ILP Program as: PAL -- PUREBRED ALTERNATIVE LISTING.

Get it? You want that word “Purebred,” in there for the cachet, even though the dog you’re buying a number for isn’t “purebred”, it just has to look like a purebred, not actually BE purebred.

It’s a perfect scheme. They have pieces of paper with numbers on them, you have the money. And there’s no troubling problem of actually having to have that paper mean anything about “bredness.” It’s a straightforward ID number so you can enter the various events and not end up with two dogs named “Fluffy.”

Or it would be straightforward, if the AKC would finally drop the phony pretense of “distinguishable as a member of an AKC registerable breed” (remember, according to one of AKC’s top inspectors, that main “register” is 50% phony in the first place , i.e. filled with PAL mutts the AKC is pretending are “purebred.” And getting a tax break for that pretense.) and simply allow everyone who wants to, to send them nice money and get an ID number so they could take their pooch – pure mutt or quasi mixed breed “purebred” to various AKC events.

In any event, THIS piece of paper with numbers on it, doesn’t run the risk of being mail fraud like so many other pieces of paper the AKC sells. This one’s at least vaguely honest, i.e. openly worthless.

Which is a step in the right direction, at least.

19 comments:

Watershed Mark said...

You make the case for RESCUE pets.

Churadogs said...

Mark sez:"You make the case for RESCUE pets."

My case has always been: Don't be fooled by that AKC "paper." Never buy a dog from a pet store. No reputable, ethical good breeder would ever, EVER sell his/her puppies to a pet store, so guess where they get those dogs with their "AKC "papers" come from? Yep, puppy mills. (Irony, you'll ikely pay MORE for a mill dog at a pet store than you would pay for a really great dog from an ethical breeder) Consider breed rescue if you want a specific breed and/or track down an actual, ethical, good breeder and check them out thoroughly. And, above all, do the homework up front before getting any kind of pet and make sure it's the right pet for you.

Oprah had a show yesterday on puppymills and I had bet myself she wouldn't mention the AKC "papers" connection -- that is, it's the AKC "papers" that's the engine that drives the puppy mill trade -- and sure enough. Not a peep.

Watershed Mark said...

So many "talk the talk", yet so few "walk the walk"...
Hopefully as people demonstrate through their actions others will be motivated to act in a constructive and helpful way.

A return to first principles in a republic is sometimes caused by the simple virtues of one man. His good example has such an influence that the good men strive to imitate him, and the wicked are ashamed to lead a life so contrary to his example.
Niccolo Machiavelli

4crapkiller said...

You make only a fair case, but to make it much better, could you explain WHY the AKC investigator was FORMER, and supply the documentation that the registry is 50% and not 75% or 10% bogus?

Otherwise, your whole piece on the AKC is speculative to the worst degree. Any facts and figures on the UKC?

In any case, in my experience, you are correct about puppy mills and buying puppies at pet shops. You are also right about breed rescue.

You are totally correct about reputable breeders, and if you want a pure bred dog, this is the only way to go. There is only one way to produce a really fine pure bred dog, and that is to breed it into it. Everything else is happen- stance. And it always does not work! Dogs are bred for different characteristics, so research is required.

Mutts make good pets, depending upon their ancestry, but without a clear look at their ancestry, it is very difficult to predict possible health problems or disposition.

Sort of like people.

The best you can do is work with a dog to be adopted, see how the dog interacts with you, kids, if you have any, and with other dogs. It is best to get a dog seven months or older, actually the older the better.

Apparently Oprah was bred smart. She did not wish to throw out unsubstantiated allegations as to the AKC "papers" connection.

Never has the AKC been in favor of puppy mills.

Watershed Mark said...

Pandora:
How about some data on the dream and how it was "krap"?

Seems the Bull has everyone's tongue regarding the big leaky/polluting pipe.

Maybe you can help out? I didn't think so.

Unknown said...

Mark, you are one of the most obnoxious ass's I've ever been near!

This blog might as well be re-named the "Mark, I Know Everything Better Than You". It certainly is NOT Ann Calhoun's any longer.

Watershed Mark said...

Mike said... You don't want a sewer, I don't think you even want the reclamator. You just like to stir the pot of discontent.
7:58 AM, March 21, 2008

Watershed Mark said...
You just like to stir the pot of discontent.


You just like to stir the pot of discontent.


You just like to stir the pot of discontent.

You know we were bald-faced lied to and you know why!

Why,Why,Why... Tell us the rest of the story, I'm listening.

5:08 PM, March 21, 2008

Churadogs said...

Crap's back(after getting 86'd) and sez:"You make only a fair case, but to make it much better, could you explain WHY the AKC investigator was FORMER, and supply the documentation that the registry is 50% and not 75% or 10% bogus?

Otherwise, your whole piece on the AKC is speculative to the worst degree. Any facts and figures on the UKC?"

Bob Nejdl, the AKC inspector in the ABC news report was retired honorably, full pension, etc. and the reason he kept quiet was he wanted to retire first before speaking out. The AKC has a long record to trashing people who tell the truth. Bob wasn't the only inspector to spill the beans (he and they were trashed -- sorta like what you do to people who spoke out about Tri-W, call them "anti-sewer obstructionists," etc.and imply they don't know what they're talking about, are merely "speculating," or in this case, implying (wrongly) that Bob was somehow a crank with a grudge.) To the contrary,Bob was one of their top investigators for years and years,helped set up their computer registration system(before it was all on litttle 3x 5 cards etc.) His estimate was based on his general knowledge of the number of investigations the AKC did of various breeders, i.e. of all his investigations, about 50% of the paperwork he checked proved out to be phonies. Since the registry has NEVER been audited the amount may, indeed, be higher.

The UKC does not get a tax exemption for "maintaining a stud registry," nor did they make any implied claims that the registration paper meant anything more than just selling people numbers. Interestingly, UKC and various other "Registries" got into the game because they realized that the public can be fooled by that piece of paper and pay more for the same dog without it so the huge millers in the midwest started up registries of their own. (The AKC secret board memo refered to the registration scheme as "the basic cash cow." Indeed! The other millers and large dog brokers figured out that cash-cow game and now are getting into it) Unlike the AKC, however, these guys are safe from charges of mail fraud because they have no investigators and make no claims as to a registry and simply say they rely on the person registering. Where AKC got into trouble was in pretending they actually were maintaining an accurate "purebred" registry (and getting tax exemption for it) and having inspectors go out and when they found a mess, disallow the breeder access to the registry (i.e. they were suspended) HOWEVER, they often did not cull the "bad" dogs out of the registry, ESPECIALLY if there were thousands of dogs involved, hence the problem of mail fraud: mailing someone something for $$ that you know is phony and you know that because, under your own rules, you've disallowed it, BUT you,uh, forget to remove it from the books, heh-heh. (Don't want to do anything to disturb the basic cash cow, no do we?)

Your problem, crap, is that you need to do some research on your own (there's tons and tons of material out there, court cases, newspaper stories on how this whole scam works & etc,) before you make your phony claims that what I've written is merely "speculative."

Oh, and crap also said:"Never has the AKC been in favor of puppy mills."

Then please explain to me why HUGE numbers of puppy mill dogs carry AKC papers? And if you saw the 20/20 program a few years ago, you'd see that the AKC stopped registration priviledges for the wife of a puppy miller but not her husband: same mill, same dogs. hahahah. No, crap, as the secret memo said: registration papers ARE the basic cash cow and they'll put papers on anything. It's not about dogs, crap, it's about money. I'm surprised you didn't bother to figure that out before making your incorrect comments.No, wait, I'm not surprised at all.

Watershed Mark said...

Looks like Pandora "crapped out"...

Churadogs said...

Mike sez:"This blog might as well be re-named the "Mark, I Know Everything Better Than You". It certainly is NOT Ann Calhoun's any longer."

Sure it is. The blog's still mine. The Comment section is for anyone who wishes to comment, so long as they mind their manners.

Watershed Mark said...

Here's a thought:
The QCB3 created the PZ on the basis of one series of tests 25 years ago.

Ann, you give great blog!

Sewertoons AKA Lynette Tornatzky said...

Oh mark, does this mean that you might think of joining the PZLDF lawsuit? I'm sure that they could use your help - at least financially. Got cash?

Watershed Mark said...

Toons:
One can only deflect for so long, even government.

We prefer to commence and finish our own "litigation".

Do your questions mean that you want our support?

How about that citizen owned sewerage/treatment data? It is already paid for and would really make the case...against sewerage and for the LOSTDEP RECLAMATOR Solution.

Si i suppose you won't be in favor of getting it published. Too bad, so sad..:(

Mike Green said...

You know, I just can't escape the idea that the AKC is to dogs is like DeBeers is to diamonds.
Lots of dogs and diamonds are available, but we need someone for some reason to tell us they are valuable (beyond utility).
The simple idea of dog breeds is kinda interesting to me, especially nowadays.
Don't get me wrong, I get a kick out of Chihuahuas and Great Danes, and if it floats your boat to create more of the same, have at it.
But why should I have to concern myself and the government that I pay for to police your fetish?

Watershed Mark said...

Got cash?
We are trying to conserve yours and your water.

Watershed Mark said...

Looks like Pandora was very, very interested in Tom's trip to Hawaii.

Thank you for thinking about him, Crap. We all appreciate it.

Churadogs said...

Mike Green sez:"You know, I just can't escape the idea that the AKC is to dogs is like DeBeers is to diamonds."

Interesting comparison. Like "blood diamonds." there's "blood dogs," ie. puppy mill dogs, that carry huge amounts of suffering with them.

He also sez:"But why should I have to concern myself and the government that I pay for to police your fetish?"

sorry, Mike, but I missed your reference? Are you suggesting mail fraud be taken off the books as a crime? Wheeeee!

4crapkiller said...

Ann: You made your case with the complete facts given in reply to my comment.

By the way, you took me off the 86'd list when Sharky complained.

Remember?

I am sending your article for comment to the AKC. Perhaps they will change their ways.

Watershed Mark said...

Oh good, now crap comes out of the closet.