Pages

Friday, April 03, 2009

Calhoun’s Can(n)ons, for April 3, 09
(Note: The Can(n)on’s print version will be on brief hiatus while The Bay News goes through some budget reconfigurations. Meanwhile, I’ll try to post here on the same bi-monthly schedule.)

Funny Business

A few years ago, I asked my sister where she got her news. With a straight face she said, “Jon Stewart’s, The Daily Show.” I thought she was joking. She wasn’t. So I started tuning in Comedy Central’s cable “fake” news show and discovered she was right. If you wanted to understand what was really going on, The Daily Show was the place to discover it.

The satirists and comic writers that make the show so deadly were some of the first to smell a rat in the ginned-up rush to war, and were relentless in pointing out the growing disconnect between what the Bush administration and the mainstream news was telling the American public. The show was also brilliant at deconstructing and satirizing just how much the mainstream news media had become propaganda or mere infotainment -- “theatre” in the literal sense of the word, complete with splashy, exciting graphics and the network’s specially composed “war news” theme music. And as for the carefully controlled “embedded” reporters, The Daily Show was merciless in presenting their own embeds -- fake reporters in their fake cammo-duds standing in front of fake green-screen projections reporting fake news with their faux-serious faces. It was the stuff of wicked satire that reminded the viewer that they really should take a closer, more critical look at the “real” news.

Even more astonishing, in the financial meltdown that left the mainstream media looking more than ever like the watchdog sleeping nowhere near the chicken coop, Jon Stewart turned into a credible newsman. The transformation began when Stewart and his band of merry writers stared asking an astonishingly simple question: Why didn’t CNBC, the cable show that’s all Wall Street, all the time, see this mess coming? After all, that’s all CNBC does – report 24/7on Wall Street’s every twitch and wiggle. Among some of the clips Stewart showed were ones of CNBC’s “Mad Money” man” Jim Cramer touting Bear Sterns shortly before that company tanked. Well, Cramer went on various other networks to whine and complain that Stewart was taking him out of context, which was the worst possible tack to take with a satirist with a large staff and endless video clips. Before long the kerfluffle was being played up in the mainstream media, and the stage was set for a fake confrontation on the fake news show.

But instead of silliness, what occurred was both sad and funny. Instead of pig’ bladders and funny beepers, once Jon Stewart had Jim Cramer in his sights, he suddenly turned into Edward R. Murrow and started asking the questions the mainstream media stopped asking years ago: Who is Cramer and CNCB serving? The American public or the corporations that own CNBC? What responsibility did CNBC (and, by extension the entire media) have to investigate Wall Street “shenanigans” – Cramer’s word. In short, with Cramer standing in for our entire media, there was the question – who do you serve?

The answer, of course, is found in a column by Alessandra Stanley in the New York Times, who correctly observes that “ . . Mr. Cramer and CNBC stood to profit from the [Daily Show] encounter. In today’s television news market, that cable network and its stars are like the financiers they cover: media short-sellers trading shamelessly on publicity, good or bad, so long as it drives up ratings. There isn’t enough regulation on Wall Street, and there’s hardly any accountability on cable news; it’s a 24-hour star system in which opinions – and showmanship – matter more than facts.”

A 24-hours star system in which opinions – and showmanship – and ratings and money – matter more than facts. Cable news, mainstream TV news, newspapers, talk radio, blogs and not a single watchdog serving the public good in sight: Just ratings and money and entertainment and whatever serves the corporate interests.

So, if you want to know what’s really going on, you have to watch a very funny fake news show. Which, come to think of it, is actually not funny at all.


9 comments:

Unknown said...

Difference between USSR Communist media and USA "mainstream media"
In Russia government make media say what they want - even if lie.
In USA "Mainstream media" try make government what they want - even if lie..
.....eventually they become same thing?!

I Igor produce Obama Birth Certificate at www.igormarxo.org

Sandra Gore said...

I learned about the "Daily" news from my (then) teenage son and daughter. They said, as well, that it was the only reliable source of news on TV. Why do I wonder why they both grew to be so cynical? It's a pity really that their generation hasn't had a chance to entertain idealism for even a brief period of their youth.

Anonymous said...

The Stewart vs. Cramer debate made for some very telling programming given the meltdown on Wall St. A good rendition & example available on youtube> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nay4VbUJl3E

This day and age, we cannot trust mainstream media for the very reasons Stewart made clear in his lashing of Cramer. The kids today need to get it from the internet or programs like The Daily Show.

Shark Inlet said...

Um .... Frontline ... NPR ... WSJ ... NYTimes ... the Economist ... all good news sources which delve into issues in some depth should not be ignored.

Even so, no one reported on the likely financial meltdown until after it happened.

Realistic1 said...

"So, if you want to know what’s really going on, you have to watch a very funny fake news show. Which, come to think of it, is actually not funny at all."

Which was exactly the point Jon Stewart so beautifully made the night he interviewed Cramer. It was one of the best pieces of actual investigative journalism I've seen on TV in years. Stewart did something similar when he appeared on Tucker Carlson's program on Fox News shortly after the Iraq war began.

Stewart made mincemeat of Carlson on his own show, and Carlson was fired from Fox shortly thereafter. I think Jon Stewart has missed his calling - as much as I love his satire, we need more "real" reporters like him.

Mike Green said...

Satire! Satire! We don't need no stinking satire!

Satire is the best source of truth because without it there is no satire.

Love Jon Stewart's show, All the dying forms of press should wake up and take a look.

Aaron Ochs - Managing Editor of The ROCK said...

Jon Stewart does more research than the typical journalists you see nowadays. It's refreshing, but saddening at the same time because a comedian is now the best TV news source.

Colbert's not too bad either. I like how he took apart Glenn Beck a few days ago.

Anne R. Allen said...

I feared that with the defeat of the comedy team of Bush/Cheney, that Stewart wouldn't be as funny, but as long as there's a F(au)x News Channel, honest fake news will be hilarious.

Sandra shouldn't despair. Stewart's underlying values are idealistic in the extreme. He tells truth to power. I can't think of a better message for kids.

Churadogs said...

annallen sez:"Sandra shouldn't despair. Stewart's underlying values are idealistic in the extreme. He tells truth to power. I can't think of a better message for kids."

How's taht old saying go, scratch a cynic and you find a wounded romantic? It's amazing that Jon has become this generations Edward R Murrow. As for kids being cynic, a healthy doese of cynicism is always good, but I think the outpouring of young people supporting Obama speaks to their ideals -- they see the mess their parents have allowed to happen and know there's a better way to skin cats. I have high hopes for these young kids. They're smart, cynical, romantic/idealistic. Great combo.